Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Program Implementation | 2 |
| Stakeholders | 2 |
| Attitudes | 1 |
| Change | 1 |
| Conflict | 1 |
| Correctional Rehabilitation | 1 |
| Credibility | 1 |
| Crime | 1 |
| Criminals | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Evaluation and Program… | 2 |
Author
| Bowman, Ruth A. | 1 |
| Bryson, John M. | 1 |
| McGarrell, Edmund F. | 1 |
| Patton, Michael Quinn | 1 |
| Sabath, Michael J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkBryson, John M.; Patton, Michael Quinn; Bowman, Ruth A. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2011
In the broad field of evaluation, the importance of stakeholders is often acknowledged and different categories of stakeholders are identified. Far less frequent is careful attention to analysis of stakeholders' interests, needs, concerns, power, priorities, and perspectives and subsequent application of that knowledge to the design of…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation, Stakeholders, Interests
Peer reviewedMcGarrell, Edmund F.; Sabath, Michael J. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1994
Partial results of an evaluation of an alternative criminal-sentencing program indicate considerable disagreement among stakeholders over perceived program effectiveness. It is argued that these disagreements are not isolated events but are likely to be inherent in any program with the potential to change established systems within a complex…
Descriptors: Attitudes, Change, Conflict, Correctional Rehabilitation
