Descriptor
Source
Exceptional Children | 8 |
Author
Amos, Katherine M. | 1 |
Brown, Lou | 1 |
Deno, Stanley L. | 1 |
Duran, Richard P. | 1 |
Koorland, Mark A. | 1 |
Marston, Douglas | 1 |
Nelson, C. Michael | 1 |
Olsen, Kenneth R. | 1 |
Patton, Patricia L. | 1 |
Smith, Stephen W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 8 |
Researchers | 2 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education for All Handicapped… | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Brown, Lou; And Others – Exceptional Children, 1981
Both segregated and desegregated school models for severely handicapped students are considered, and an individualized transition plan is proposed. Among the plan's major components are that it must be comprehensive, involve parents and guardians, require actual participation of both sending and receiving personnel, and include the focused…
Descriptors: Curriculum, Individualized Education Programs, Mainstreaming, Models

Amos, Katherine M. – Exceptional Children, 1980
The discussion of minimum competency testing (MCT) for learning disabled students focuses on advantages and disadvantages, the need for test modifications, and the importance of coordinating the child's individualized education program with MCT considerations. (CL)
Descriptors: Individualized Education Programs, Learning Disabilities, Minimum Competency Testing, Secondary Education

Patton, Patricia L. – Exceptional Children, 1981
The article describes the McCarron-Dial Work Evaluation System (MDWES) model of vocational evaluation and development for handicapped youth. Sections address the theoretical basis of the model, application and research, five factors which predict vocational competency, factor interpretation and priortizing, and MDWES data in the individualized…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Individualized Education Programs, Job Skills, Models

Olsen, Kenneth R. – Exceptional Children, 1980
A rationale is provided for integrating steps that are necessary both in minimum competency testing programs and in the process required under Public Law 94-142 (the Education for All Handicapped Children Act) for developing individualized education programs for handicapped children. (Author)
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation

Smith, Stephen W. – Exceptional Children, 1990
A review of the literature on Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) from 1975 to 1989 identifies three phases (a normative phase, an analytic phase, and a technology reaction phase), and reveals a history of IEPs' inadequacies and passive compliance, in contrast to the original intent of Public Law 94-142. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Disabilities, Educational Change, Educational History

Koorland, Mark A.; Nelson, C. Michael – Exceptional Children, 1990
This critique discusses conceptual and practical issues raised in a paper by D. Marston (EC 210 837) on choosing the most technically adequate graph for measuring progress on individual education plans. The critique argues that the Standard Behavior Chart is a technically adequate and useful measurement tool. (JDD)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Graphs

Marston, Douglas; Deno, Stanley L. – Exceptional Children, 1990
This article responds to a criticism (EC 231 964) of a paper that discusses graphs for measuring progress on individual education plans (EC 210 837). It notes that the type of chart used is not a major issue; the important point is that teachers repeatedly gather data on educationally relevant tasks and evaluate intervention effectiveness. (JDD)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Graphs

Duran, Richard P. – Exceptional Children, 1989
Limitations in standardized test use with Hispanic students are summarized and recent research developments supporting use of testing and assessment as tools for promoting learning are examined. Assisted performance and dynamic assessment are discussed in the context of individual education plans and a test-train-test cycle. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, High Risk Students, Hispanic American Students