NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Field Methods20
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 16 to 20 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guest, Greg; Namey, Emily; McKenna, Kevin – Field Methods, 2017
Few empirical studies exist to guide researchers in determining the number of focus groups necessary for a research study. The analyses described here provide foundational evidence to help researchers in this regard. We conducted a thematic analysis of 40 focus groups on health-seeking behaviors of African American men in Durham, North Carolina.…
Descriptors: Focus Groups, Sample Size, Evidence Based Practice, Thematic Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moosa, Sheena; Koopman-Boyden, Peggy – Field Methods, 2016
Representing isolated small island communities through social survey research continues to be challenging. We examine a locally developed method to reach and recruit older people (65+ years) for a survey on well-being in the small island developing state of Maldives. The use of messengers to recruit participants is examined in the context of these…
Descriptors: Developing Nations, Social Science Research, Recruitment, Participant Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stange, Mathew; Smyth, Jolene D.; Olson, Kristen – Field Methods, 2016
Although researchers can easily select probability samples of addresses using the U.S. Postal Service's Delivery Sequence File, randomly selecting respondents within households for surveys remains challenging. Researchers often place within-household selection instructions, such as the next or last birthday methods, in survey cover letters to…
Descriptors: Mail Surveys, Research Methodology, Family (Sociological Unit), Community Surveys
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barratt, Monica J.; Ferris, Jason A.; Lenton, Simon – Field Methods, 2015
Online purposive samples have unknown biases and may not strictly be used to make inferences about wider populations, yet such inferences continue to occur. We compared the demographic and drug use characteristics of Australian ecstasy users from a probability (National Drug Strategy Household Survey, n = 726) and purposive sample (online survey…
Descriptors: Sampling, Validity, Drug Abuse, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Golinelli, Daniela; Tucker, Joan S.; Ryan, Gery W.; Wenzel, Suzanne L. – Field Methods, 2015
Studies of homeless individuals typically sample subjects from few types of sites or regions within a metropolitan area. This article focuses on the biases that can result from such a practice. We obtained a probability sample of 419 homeless youth from 41 sites (shelters, drop-in centers, and streets) in four regions of Los Angeles County (LAC).…
Descriptors: Probability, Homeless People, Emergency Shelters, Sampling
« Previous Page | Next Page
Pages: 1  |  2