Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Intervention | 2 |
| Moderate Intellectual… | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Autism | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Discussion (Teaching… | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Generalization | 1 |
| Guides | 1 |
| Handwriting | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Focus on Autism and Other… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Clinical Evaluation of… | 1 |
| Preschool Language Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkShurr, Jordan; Taber-Doughty, Teresa – Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 2017
Students with moderate intellectual disability often experience limited access to age-appropriate texts due to limitations in reading skills, access to instruction and supports, and educator beliefs. Use of text read alouds is an emerging tool for increasing such access; however, supports are often still required for access to age-appropriate…
Descriptors: High School Students, Moderate Intellectual Disability, Intervention, Pictorial Stimuli
Pennington, Robert; Flick, Allison; Smith-Wehr, Kendra – Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 2018
In the current study, we examined the effects of response prompting strategies (i.e., constant time delay, system of least prompts) and frames on sentence writing for three participants, ages 7 to 12, with moderate intellectual disability. We used a concurrent multiple probe across behaviors design to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention…
Descriptors: Prompting, Teaching Methods, Moderate Intellectual Disability, Time
