Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Behavior Modification | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Intervention | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Research Design | 2 |
| Sensory Training | 2 |
| Synthesis | 2 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Evidence Based Practice | 1 |
| Meta Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
| Barton, Erin E. | 2 |
| Ledford, Jennifer R. | 2 |
| Lloyd, Blair P. | 2 |
| Pustejovsky, James E. | 2 |
| Severini, Katherine E. | 2 |
| Zimmerman, Kathleen N. | 2 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkZimmerman, Kathleen N.; Ledford, Jennifer R.; Severini, Katherine E.; Pustejovsky, James E.; Barton, Erin E.; Lloyd, Blair P. – Grantee Submission, 2018
Tools for evaluating the quality and rigor of single case research designs (SCD) are often used when conducting SCD syntheses. Preferred components include evaluations of design features related to the internal validity of SCD to obtain quality and/or rigor ratings. Three tools for evaluating the quality and rigor of SCD (Council for Exceptional…
Descriptors: Research Design, Evaluation Methods, Synthesis, Validity
Zimmerman, Kathleen N.; Pustejovsky, James E.; Ledford, Jennifer R.; Barton, Erin E.; Severini, Katherine E.; Lloyd, Blair P. – Grantee Submission, 2018
Varying methods for evaluating the outcomes of single case research designs (SCD) are currently used in reviews and meta-analyses of interventions. Quantitative effect size measures are often presented alongside visual analysis conclusions. Six measures across two classes--overlap measures (percentage non-overlapping data, improvement rate…
Descriptors: Research Design, Evaluation Methods, Synthesis, Intervention
