Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Natural Language Processing | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Summative Evaluation | 1 |
| Undergraduate Students | 1 |
| Vocabulary | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Author
| Allen, Laura K. | 1 |
| Barker, Kennis E. | 1 |
| Flynn, Lauren E. | 1 |
| Lindsay, Grace C. | 1 |
| McClure, Caleb M. | 1 |
| McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
| Sonia, Allison N. | 1 |
| Öncel, Püren | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full text
Direct linkÖncel, Püren; Flynn, Lauren E.; Sonia, Allison N.; Barker, Kennis E.; Lindsay, Grace C.; McClure, Caleb M.; McNamara, Danielle S.; Allen, Laura K. – Grantee Submission, 2021
Automated Writing Evaluation systems have been developed to help students improve their writing skills through the automated delivery of both summative and formative feedback. These systems have demonstrated strong potential in a variety of educational contexts; however, they remain limited in their personalization and scope. The purpose of the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Summative Evaluation
