Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Source
Grantee Submission | 9 |
Author
Danielle S. McNamara | 3 |
Laura K. Allen | 3 |
McNamara, Danielle S. | 3 |
Rod D. Roscoe | 3 |
Crossley, Scott A. | 2 |
Aaron D. Likens | 1 |
Afrin, Tazin | 1 |
Allen, Laura | 1 |
Allen, Laura K. | 1 |
Burstein, Jill | 1 |
Correnti, Richard | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 8 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
High Schools | 4 |
Secondary Education | 4 |
Grade 9 | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McCaffrey, Daniel F.; Zhang, Mo; Burstein, Jill – Grantee Submission, 2022
Background: This exploratory writing analytics study uses argumentative writing samples from two performance contexts--standardized writing assessments and university English course writing assignments--to compare: (1) linguistic features in argumentative writing; and (2) relationships between linguistic characteristics and academic performance…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Academic Language, Writing (Composition), Academic Achievement
Wan, Qian; Crossley, Scott; Allen, Laura; McNamara, Danielle – Grantee Submission, 2020
In this paper, we extracted content-based and structure-based features of text to predict human annotations for claims and nonclaims in argumentative essays. We compared Logistic Regression, Bernoulli Naive Bayes, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Linear Support Vector Classification, Random Forest, and Neural Networks to train classification models. Random…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Essays, Writing Evaluation, Natural Language Processing
Kathryn S. McCarthy; Rod D. Roscoe; Laura K. Allen; Aaron D. Likens; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2022
The benefits of writing strategy feedback are well established. This study examined the extent to which adding spelling and grammar checkers support writing and revision in comparison to providing writing strategy feedback alone. High school students (n = 119) wrote and revised six persuasive essays in Writing Pal, an automated writing evaluation…
Descriptors: High School Students, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Computer Software
Afrin, Tazin; Wang, Elaine; Litman, Diane; Matsumura, Lindsay C.; Correnti, Richard – Grantee Submission, 2020
Automated writing evaluation systems can improve students' writing insofar as students attend to the feedback provided and revise their essay drafts in ways aligned with such feedback. Existing research on revision of argumentative writing in such systems, however, has focused on the types of revisions students make (e.g., surface vs. content)…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Persuasive Discourse, Revision (Written Composition), Documentation
Rod D. Roscoe; Erica L. Snow; Laura K. Allen; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2015
The Writing Pal is an intelligent tutoring system designed to support writing proficiency and strategy acquisition for adolescent writers. A fundamental aspect of the instructional model is automated formative feedback that provides concrete information and strategies oriented toward student improvement. In this paper, the authors explore…
Descriptors: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Automation, Feedback (Response), Revision (Written Composition)
Allen, Laura K.; Likens, Aaron D.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2018
The assessment of argumentative writing generally includes analyses of the specific linguistic and rhetorical features contained in the individual essays produced by students. However, researchers have recently proposed that an individual's ability to flexibly adapt the linguistic properties of their writing may more accurately capture their…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Persuasive Discourse, Essays, Language Usage
Danielle S. McNamara; Scott A. Crossley; Rod D. Roscoe; Laura K. Allen; Jianmin Dai – Grantee Submission, 2015
This study evaluates the use of a hierarchical classification approach to automated assessment of essays. Automated essay scoring (AES) generally relies onmachine learning techniques that compute essay scores using a set of text variables. Unlike previous studies that rely on regression models, this study computes essay scores using a hierarchical…
Descriptors: Automation, Scoring, Essays, Persuasive Discourse
Guo, Liang; Crossley, Scott A.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2013
This study explores whether linguistic features can predict second language writing proficiency in the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL iBT) integrated and independent writing tasks and, if so, whether there are differences and similarities in the two sets of predictive linguistic features. Linguistic features related to lexical…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Linguistics, Second Language Learning, Writing Skills
Crossley, Scott A.; Varner, Laura K.; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2013
Linguistic properties of writing prompts have been shown to influence the writing patterns contained in student essays. The majority of previous research on these prompt-based effects has focused on the lexical and syntactic properties of writing prompts and essays. The current study expands this research by investigating the effects of prompt…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Prompting, Writing Instruction, Essays