Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
Predictor Variables | 5 |
Scores | 4 |
Elementary School Students | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Reading Fluency | 3 |
Reading Tests | 3 |
Correlation | 2 |
Curriculum Based Assessment | 2 |
Grade 2 | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Grantee Submission | 5 |
Author
Nese, Joseph F. T. | 2 |
Beigman Klebanov, Beata | 1 |
Burdick, Hal | 1 |
Burstein, Jill | 1 |
Crossley, Scott | 1 |
Elmore, Jeff | 1 |
Firetto, Carla M. | 1 |
Greene, Jeffrey A. | 1 |
Kahn, Josh | 1 |
Kamata, Akihito | 1 |
Kosh, Audra E. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Intermediate Grades | 3 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Grade 2 | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Oregon | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
ACT Assessment | 1 |
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
easyCBM | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nese, Joseph F. T. – Grantee Submission, 2022
Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) is used as an indicator of reading proficiency, and to measure at risk students' response to reading interventions to help ensure effective instruction. The purpose of this study was to compare model-based words read correctly per minute (WCPM) scores (computerized oral reading…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Curriculum Based Assessment
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Kahn, Josh; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2017
Despite prevalent use and practical application, the current and standard assessment of oral reading fluency (ORF) presents considerable limitations which reduces its validity in estimating growth and monitoring student progress, including: (a) high cost of implementation; (b) tenuous passage equivalence; and (c) bias, large standard error, and…
Descriptors: Automation, Speech, Recognition (Psychology), Scores
Kosh, Audra E.; Greene, Jeffrey A.; Murphy, P. Karen; Burdick, Hal; Firetto, Carla M.; Elmore, Jeff – Grantee Submission, 2018
We explored the feasibility of using automated scoring to assess upper-elementary students' reading ability through analysis of transcripts of students' small-group discussions about texts. Participants included 35 fourth-grade students across two classrooms that engaged in a literacy intervention called Quality Talk. During the course of one…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Small Group Instruction, Group Discussion, Student Evaluation
Burstein, Jill; McCaffrey, Dan; Beigman Klebanov, Beata; Ling, Guangming – Grantee Submission, 2017
No significant body of research examines writing achievement and the specific skills and knowledge in the writing domain for postsecondary (college) students in the U.S., even though many at-risk students lack the prerequisite writing skills required to persist in their education. This paper addresses this gap through a novel…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Writing Evaluation, Writing Achievement, College Students
Crossley, Scott; McNamara, Danielle – Grantee Submission, 2013
This study explores the potential for automated indices related to speech delivery, language use, and topic development to model human judgments of TOEFL speaking proficiency in second language (L2) speech samples. For this study, 244 transcribed TOEFL speech samples taken from 244 L2 learners were analyzed using automated indices taken from…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Language Proficiency, Language Tests, Speech Communication