NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Grantee Submission25
Audience
Location
Oregon1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 25 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stefan Ruseti; Ionut Paraschiv; Mihai Dascalu; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2024
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) is a well-studied problem in Natural Language Processing applied in education. Solutions vary from handcrafted linguistic features to large Transformer-based models, implying a significant effort in feature extraction and model implementation. We introduce a novel Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) pipeline…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Automation, Essays
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sami Baral; Eamon Worden; Wen-Chiang Lim; Zhuang Luo; Christopher Santorelli; Ashish Gurung; Neil Heffernan – Grantee Submission, 2024
The effectiveness of feedback in enhancing learning outcomes is well documented within Educational Data Mining (EDM). Various prior research have explored methodologies to enhance the effectiveness of feedback to students in various ways. Recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) have extended their utility in enhancing automated…
Descriptors: Automation, Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Natural Language Processing
Peter Organisciak; Selcuk Acar; Denis Dumas; Kelly Berthiaume – Grantee Submission, 2023
Automated scoring for divergent thinking (DT) seeks to overcome a key obstacle to creativity measurement: the effort, cost, and reliability of scoring open-ended tests. For a common test of DT, the Alternate Uses Task (AUT), the primary automated approach casts the problem as a semantic distance between a prompt and the resulting idea in a text…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Creative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Wan, Qian; Crossley, Scott; Allen, Laura; McNamara, Danielle – Grantee Submission, 2020
In this paper, we extracted content-based and structure-based features of text to predict human annotations for claims and nonclaims in argumentative essays. We compared Logistic Regression, Bernoulli Naive Bayes, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Linear Support Vector Classification, Random Forest, and Neural Networks to train classification models. Random…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Essays, Writing Evaluation, Natural Language Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Zhang, Haoran; Litman, Diane – Grantee Submission, 2020
While automated essay scoring (AES) can reliably grade essays at scale, automated writing evaluation (AWE) additionally provides formative feedback to guide essay revision. However, a neural AES typically does not provide useful feature representations for supporting AWE. This paper presents a method for linking AWE and neural AES, by extracting…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Essay Tests, Writing Evaluation
Carla Wood; Miguel Garcia-Salas; Christopher Schatschneider – Grantee Submission, 2023
Purpose: The aim of this study was to advance the analysis of written language transcripts by validating an automated scoring procedure using an automated open-access tool for calculating morphological complexity (MC) from written transcripts. Method: The MC of words in 146 written responses of students in fifth grade was assessed using two…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Computation
Botarleanu, Robert-Mihai; Dascalu, Mihai; Allen, Laura K.; Crossley, Scott Andrew; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2021
Text summarization is an effective reading comprehension strategy. However, summary evaluation is complex and must account for various factors including the summary and the reference text. This study examines a corpus of approximately 3,000 summaries based on 87 reference texts, with each summary being manually scored on a 4-point Likert scale.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Natural Language Processing, Computer Software
Panaite, Marilena; Ruseti, Stefan; Dascalu, Mihai; Balyan, Renu; McNamara, Danielle S.; Trausan-Matu, Stefan – Grantee Submission, 2019
Intelligence Tutoring Systems (ITSs) focus on promoting knowledge acquisition, while providing relevant feedback during students' practice. Self-explanation practice is an effective method used to help students understand complex texts by leveraging comprehension. Our aim is to introduce a deep learning neural model for automatically scoring…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Natural Language Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Selcuk Acar; Denis Dumas; Peter Organisciak; Kelly Berthiaume – Grantee Submission, 2024
Creativity is highly valued in both education and the workforce, but assessing and developing creativity can be difficult without psychometrically robust and affordable tools. The open-ended nature of creativity assessments has made them difficult to score, expensive, often imprecise, and therefore impractical for school- or district-wide use. To…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Elementary School Students, Artificial Intelligence, Measurement Techniques
Guerrero, Tricia A.; Wiley, Jennifer – Grantee Submission, 2019
Teachers may wish to use open-ended learning activities and tests, but they are burdensome to assess compared to forced-choice instruments. At the same time, forced-choice assessments suffer from issues of guessing (when used as tests) and may not encourage valuable behaviors of construction and generation of understanding (when used as learning…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Student Evaluation, Introductory Courses, Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Magliano, Joseph P.; Lampi, Jodi P.; Ray, Melissa; Chan, Greta – Grantee Submission, 2020
Coherent mental models for successful comprehension require inferences that establish semantic "bridges" between discourse constituents and "elaborations" that incorporate relevant background knowledge. While it is established that individual differences in the extent to which postsecondary students engage in these processes…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Strategies, Inferences, Reading Tests
Beula M. Magimairaj; Philip Capin; Sandra L. Gillam; Sharon Vaughn; Greg Roberts; Anna-Maria Fall; Ronald B. Gillam – Grantee Submission, 2022
Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the online administered format of the Test of Narrative Language--Second Edition (TNL-2; Gillam & Pearson, 2017), given the importance of assessing children's narrative ability and considerable absence of psychometric studies of spoken language assessments administered online.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Language Tests, Story Telling, Language Impairments
Li, Haiying; Cai, Zhiqiang; Graesser, Arthur – Grantee Submission, 2018
In this study we developed and evaluated a crowdsourcing-based latent semantic analysis (LSA) approach to computerized summary scoring (CSS). LSA is a frequently used mathematical component in CSS, where LSA similarity represents the extent to which the to-be-graded target summary is similar to a model summary or a set of exemplar summaries.…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Semantics, Evaluation Methods
Sterett H. Mercer; Joanna E. Cannon – Grantee Submission, 2022
We evaluated the validity of an automated approach to learning progress assessment (aLPA) for English written expression. Participants (n = 105) were students in Grades 2-12 who had parent-identified learning difficulties and received academic tutoring through a community-based organization. Participants completed narrative writing samples in the…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Secondary School Students, Learning Problems, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ben Seipel; Sarah E. Carlson; Virginia Clinton-Lisell; Mark L. Davison; Patrick C. Kennedy – Grantee Submission, 2022
Originally designed for students in Grades 3 through 5, MOCCA (formerly the Multiple-choice Online Causal Comprehension Assessment), identifies students who struggle with comprehension, and helps uncover why they struggle. There are many reasons why students might not comprehend what they read. They may struggle with decoding, or reading words…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Reading Tests
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2