Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Error Patterns | 3 |
Scoring | 3 |
Oral Reading | 2 |
Reading Fluency | 2 |
Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Audio Equipment | 1 |
Automation | 1 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
Documentation | 1 |
Learning Processes | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Grantee Submission | 3 |
Author
Akihito Kamata | 1 |
Allen, Laura K. | 1 |
Alonzo, Julie | 1 |
Botarleanu, Robert-Mihai | 1 |
Cornelis Potgieter | 1 |
Crossley, Scott Andrew | 1 |
Dascalu, Mihai | 1 |
Kamata, Akihito | 1 |
McNamara, Danielle S. | 1 |
Nese, Joseph F. T. | 1 |
Xin Qiao | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Xin Qiao; Akihito Kamata; Cornelis Potgieter – Grantee Submission, 2024
Oral reading fluency (ORF) assessments are commonly used to screen at-risk readers and evaluate interventions' effectiveness as curriculum-based measurements. Similar to the standard practice in item response theory (IRT), calibrated passage parameter estimates are currently used as if they were population values in model-based ORF scoring.…
Descriptors: Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Error Patterns, Scoring
Botarleanu, Robert-Mihai; Dascalu, Mihai; Allen, Laura K.; Crossley, Scott Andrew; McNamara, Danielle S. – Grantee Submission, 2022
Automated scoring of student language is a complex task that requires systems to emulate complex and multi-faceted human evaluation criteria. Summary scoring brings an additional layer of complexity to automated scoring because it involves two texts of differing lengths that must be compared. In this study, we present our approach to automate…
Descriptors: Automation, Scoring, Documentation, Likert Scales
Nese, Joseph F. T.; Alonzo, Julie; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2016
The purpose of this study was to compare traditional oral reading fluency (ORF) measures to a computerized oral reading evaluation (CORE) system that uses speech recognition software. We applied a mixed model approach with two within-subject variables to test the mean WCPM score differences and the error rates between: passage length (25, 50, 85,…
Descriptors: Text Structure, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Reading Tests