Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Higher Education Research and… | 2 |
Author
| Barnard, A. | 1 |
| Bolt, S. | 1 |
| Bretag, Tracey | 1 |
| Curtis, Guy J. | 1 |
| McEvoy, K. | 1 |
| McNeill, Margot | 1 |
| Nash, R. | 1 |
| Rochester, S. | 1 |
| Shannon, S. | 1 |
| Slade, Christine | 1 |
| Waters, C. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCurtis, Guy J.; Slade, Christine; Bretag, Tracey; McNeill, Margot – Higher Education Research and Development, 2022
In 2019, the Australian higher education regulator, the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), commissioned a team of academic integrity experts to design and facilitate a series of national workshops, with the aim of increasing academic integrity knowledge and building a culture of integrity across the higher education sector.…
Descriptors: Program Development, Program Evaluation, Expertise, Integrity
Barnard, A.; Nash, R.; McEvoy, K.; Shannon, S.; Waters, C.; Rochester, S.; Bolt, S. – Higher Education Research and Development, 2015
Peer review of teaching is recognized increasingly as one strategy for academic development even though historically peer review of teaching is often unsupported by policy, action and culture in many Australian universities. Higher education leaders report that academics generally do not engage with peer review of teaching in a systematic or…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Sustainability, Models
