NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Colom, Roberto; Quiroga, Ma. Angeles; Solana, Ana Beatriz; Burgaleta, Miguel; Roman, Francisco J.; Privado, Jesus; Escorial, Sergio; Martinez, Kenia; Alvarez-Linera, Juan; Alfayate, Eva; Garcia, Felipe; Lepage, Claude; Hernandez-Tamames, Juan Antonio; Karama, Sherif – Intelligence, 2012
Here gray and white matter changes after four weeks of videogame practice were analyzed using optimized voxel-based morphometry (VBM), cortical surface and cortical thickness indices, and white matter integrity computed from several projection, commissural, and association tracts relevant to cognition. Beginning with a sample of one hundred young…
Descriptors: Tests, Cognitive Ability, Control Groups, Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kempel, P.; Gohlke, B.; Klempau, J.; Zinsberger, P.; Reuter, M.; Hennig, J. – Intelligence, 2005
Based on stimulating findings suggesting that prenatal levels of steroids may influence cognitive functions, a study with N=40 healthy volunteers of both sexes was conducted. Prenatal levels of testosterone (T) were estimated by use of the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) which is supposed to be controlled by the same genes involved in…
Descriptors: Females, Cognitive Tests, Spatial Ability, Males
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Humphreys, Lloyd G.; Parsons, Charles K. – Intelligence, 1979
A reanalysis of Stephens' intercorrelations of Wechsler subtests, achievement tests, and Piagetian tasks was conducted. (EJ 055 112) Piagetian tasks contributed almost equally to the definition of the general factor in intelligence along with the Wechsler subtests and the achievement tests. Communality outweighed differences between intelligence…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Glass, Gene V.; Stephens, Beth – Intelligence, 1980
Relationships among Piagetian reasoning assessments and standard measures of intelligence and achievement were determined in 1972 by Stephens, McLaughlin, Miller, and Glass (EJ 055 112). The data were reanalyzed by Humphreys and Parsons in 1979 (EJ 218 642). In reply, Glass and Stephens note fallacies in Humphreys' and Parsons' reasoning.…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Deary, Ian J.; Whalley, Lawrence J.; Crawford, John R. – Intelligence, 2004
Change in cognitive functioning is an important aspect of human aging and a key outcome in many medical conditions. However, cognitive change can rarely be measured directly, since prior cognitive data do not exist for most people. We examined the criterion validity and one-year stability of the difference between National Adult Reading Test…
Descriptors: Aging (Individuals), Test Validity, Cognitive Ability, Older Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Humphreys, Lloyd G. – Intelligence, 1980
Stephens et al. (EJ 055 112) committed a serious methodological error in holding chronological age constant in their IQ measures and allowing it to vary in their Piagetian developmental measures. This error is unrelated to differences in factor rotation methods used by these authors and was not answered in their reply. (CTM)
Descriptors: Chronological Age, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kohlberg, Lawrence; DeVries, Rheta – Intelligence, 1980
These authors cite their own study of the relationship between traditional measures of intelligence and Piagetian measures of cognitive development in support of Glass and Stephens' contention that there are important qualitative differences. They question Humphreys' and Parsons' conclusions on both substantive and factor theoretical grounds. (CTM)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Campbell, Frances A.; Ramey, Craig T. – Intelligence, 1990
The effects of early educational intervention on the attainment of the Piagetian cognitive stage of concrete operations by 86 socioeconomically disadvantaged children aged 5, 6, and 7 years were assessed. The Concept Assessment Kit-Conservation developed by M. L. Goldschmid and P. M. Bentler (1968) was used. (SLD)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Tests, Comparative Testing