Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
| International Journal of… | 3 |
Author
| Admiraal, W. | 1 |
| Bientzle, Martina | 1 |
| Cress, Ulrike | 1 |
| Glassner, Amnon | 1 |
| Lingnau, Andreas | 1 |
| Schwarz, Baruch B. | 1 |
| Simons, P. R. J. | 1 |
| Wodzicki, Katrin | 1 |
| van der Pol, J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCress, Ulrike; Wodzicki, Katrin; Bientzle, Martina; Lingnau, Andreas – International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2011
Computer-supported collaborative learning has an unexploited potential of becoming an effective learning method for pupils with intellectual disabilities. This paper aims at showing how some specific requirements of this target group may be met by structuring a learning situation with the help of "floor control," which restricts the opportunities…
Descriptors: Mental Retardation, Interaction, Special Needs Students, Communication Strategies
Schwarz, Baruch B.; Glassner, Amnon – International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2007
Argumentative activity has been found beneficial for construction of knowledge and evaluation of information in some conditions. Many theorists in CSCL and some empiricists have suggested that graphical representations may help in this endeavor. In the present study, we examine effects of type of ontology and of synchronicity in students that…
Descriptors: Grade 7, Persuasive Discourse, Discussion Groups, Communication Strategies
van der Pol, J.; Admiraal, W.; Simons, P. R. J. – International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2006
A system for "anchored discussion" is compared with a system for traditional forum discussion (Blackboard), and their collaborative and communicative affordances for the collaborative processing of academic texts are investigated. Results show that discussion in the system for anchored discussion is more directed at processing the meaning of texts…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Cooperation, Discussion Groups, Communication Strategies
