Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Evaluators | 3 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
Scoring | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Cutting Scores | 1 |
Essay Tests | 1 |
Foreign Countries | 1 |
Foreign Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
International Journal of… | 3 |
Author
Childs, Ruth A. | 1 |
Eckes, Thomas | 1 |
Engelhard, George, Jr. | 1 |
Foltz, Peter | 1 |
Jaciw, Andrew P. | 1 |
Jin, Kuan-Yu | 1 |
Rosenstein, Mark | 1 |
Saunders, Kelsey | 1 |
Wind, Stefanie A. | 1 |
Wolfe, Edward W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Eckes, Thomas; Jin, Kuan-Yu – International Journal of Testing, 2021
Severity and centrality are two main kinds of rater effects posing threats to the validity and fairness of performance assessments. Adopting Jin and Wang's (2018) extended facets modeling approach, we separately estimated the magnitude of rater severity and centrality effects in the web-based TestDaF (Test of German as a Foreign Language) writing…
Descriptors: Language Tests, German, Second Languages, Writing Tests
Wind, Stefanie A.; Wolfe, Edward W.; Engelhard, George, Jr.; Foltz, Peter; Rosenstein, Mark – International Journal of Testing, 2018
Automated essay scoring engines (AESEs) are becoming increasingly popular as an efficient method for performance assessments in writing, including many language assessments that are used worldwide. Before they can be used operationally, AESEs must be "trained" using machine-learning techniques that incorporate human ratings. However, the…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Essay Tests, Writing Evaluation, Scoring
Childs, Ruth A.; Jaciw, Andrew P.; Saunders, Kelsey – International Journal of Testing, 2007
Many approaches to standard-setting use item calibration and student score estimation results to structure panelists' tasks. However, this requires collecting standard-setting judgments after the item analysis results are available. The Scoring Guide Alignment approach collects standard-setting judgments during the scoring sessions from teachers…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Scoring, Item Analysis, Test Items