Descriptor
Source
Journal for Research in… | 4 |
Author
Austin, Joe Dan | 1 |
Fennema, Elizabeth H. | 1 |
Juilfs, Patricia A. | 1 |
Kirshner, David | 1 |
Threadgill-Sowder, Judith A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Researchers | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Austin, Joe Dan – Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1974
Seventy-one college students were taught probability and statistics for one month by one of three methods: MP, manipulative-pictorial; P, pictorial; and S, symbolic. Analysis of variance yielded significant differences (p.05) between treatment groups for selected subtests of an achievement test and generally favored MP and P over S.
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Instruction, Intermode Differences, Manipulative Materials

Fennema, Elizabeth H. – Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1972
A concrete and a symbolic approach to learning multiplication in the second grade are studied. The results, indicating that children using the symbolic model performed at a higher level than those using a concrete model, are discussed. (DT)
Descriptors: Elementary School Mathematics, Experiential Learning, Instruction, Learning

Kirshner, David – Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1989
A structured system of visual features is seen to parallel the propositional hierarchy of operations usually associated with the parsing of algebraic expressions. Women more than men were found to depend on these visual cues. Possible causes and consequences are discussed. Subjects were secondary and college students. (Author/DC)
Descriptors: Algebra, Cognitive Style, College Mathematics, Concept Formation

Juilfs, Patricia A.; Threadgill-Sowder, Judith A. – Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1980
The interactive effects between mathematical achievement and manipulative v symbolic instruction with junior high school students are examined in this report. Low-achieving students benefited more from a manipulative approach to logical connectives, whereas high achieving students found the symbolic approach to be more effective. (MP)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Aptitude, Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Grade 7