NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mellott, Joshua A.; Ardoin, Scott P. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2023
Duration schedules of reinforcement for continuous behavior abide by several preexisting operant behavioral economic equations for reinforcer cost, otherwise known as price, and consumption. Duration schedules require behaviors to occur for a set duration of time prior to accessing reinforcement, unlike interval schedules that produce…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Preferences, Student Attitudes, Scheduling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Contreras, Bethany P.; Betz, Alison M. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2016
Previous research has demonstrated the utility of using lag schedules of reinforcement to increase response variability of children with autism. However, little research has evaluated whether the lag schedule promotes variability from within an already-established repertoire or expands the current repertoire by promoting the use of new responses…
Descriptors: Autism, Children, Reinforcement, Scheduling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bukala, Magdalena; Hu, Meng Yao; Lee, Ronald; Ward-Horner, John C.; Fienup, Daniel M. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2015
This study investigated performance under and preference for continuous and discontinuous work-reinforcer schedules in 3 students who had been diagnosed with autism. Under continuous schedules, participants completed all work and consumed all reinforcers in contiguous units. Under discontinuous schedules, work and reinforcer access were broken up…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Scheduling, Autism, Performance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ward-Horner, John C.; Pittenger, Alexis; Pace, Gary; Fienup, Daniel M. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2014
When the overall magnitude of reinforcement is matched between 2 alternative work schedules, some students prefer to complete all of their work for continuous access to a reinforcer (continuous work) rather than distributed access to a reinforcer while they work (discontinuous work). We evaluated a student's preference for continuous work by…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Scheduling, Student Attitudes, Preferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Betz, Alison M.; Fisher, Wayne W.; Roane, Henry S.; Mintz, Joslyn C.; Owen, Todd M. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2013
One limitation of functional communication training (FCT) is that individuals may request reinforcement via the functional communication response (FCR) at exceedingly high rates. Multiple schedules with alternating periods of reinforcement and extinction of the FCR combined with gradually lengthening the extinction-component interval can…
Descriptors: Functional Behavioral Assessment, Communication Strategies, Reinforcement, Intervention
Roane, Henry S. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2008
Examination of responding under various schedule arrangements is a core component of many analyses of operant behavior. Much of the pioneering work in applied behavior analysis was bred from laboratory research involving the exposure of nonhuman subjects to a variety of schedule arrangements. Hodos (1961) described a schedule arrangement in which…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Behavior Modification, Responses, Scheduling
Tiger, Jeffrey H.; Hanley, Gregory P.; Heal, Nicole A. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2006
Multiple schedules of reinforcement have been used to teach children to recruit attention only when it is available, thereby minimizing disruptive requesting during instructional activities. This procedure involves alternating periods of continuous reinforcement (CRF) with periods of extinction and correlating each period with a distinct and…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Scheduling, Preschool Children, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Binder, Lisa M.; Dixon, Mark R.; Ghezzi, Patrick M. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2000
A study compared two methods for programming and thinning noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) schedules during the treatment of self-injurious behavior (SIB) of three adults with mental retardation. Results found that both schedules were effective in initially reducing SIB and in maintaining response suppression as the schedules were thinned.…
Descriptors: Adults, Mental Retardation, Outcomes of Treatment, Program Effectiveness