Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Observation | 2 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Disabilities | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Exceptional Child Research | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Performance Factors | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Applied Behavior… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkDempsey, Carrie M.; Iwata, Brian A.; Fritz, Jennifer N.; Rolider, Natalie U. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2012
We compared the effects of 2 observer-training procedures. In vivo training involved practice during actual treatment sessions. Video training involved practice while watching progressively more complex simulations. Fifty-nine undergraduate students entered 1 of the 2 training conditions sequentially according to an ABABAB design. Results showed…
Descriptors: Video Technology, Training Methods, Undergraduate Students, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewedKomaki, Judith L. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1998
Five criteria are proposed for evaluating performance in research studies: the directness of sampling, the responsiveness of the target, the reliability of the observers, the frequent assessment of the target during the intervention period, and the critical nature of the target. A case study illustrates effectiveness of the criteria. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Data Analysis, Disabilities, Evaluation Criteria
