NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
M. J. Delforterie; A. Turhan; M. Driessen; L. Neijmeijer; B. Hesper; R. Didden – Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2024
Introduction: This study investigated the reliability and validity of the dynamic risk outcome scales--short version (DROS-SV). This instrument is developed to monitor treatment progress using dynamic risk factors in clients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning and behavioural and/or mental health problems.…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Reliability, Validity, Risk
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zaja, Rebecca H.; Moore, Linda; van Ingen, Daniel J.; Rojahn, Johannes – Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2011
Background: Psychometric properties of three functional assessment rating scales were compared for three types of target behaviours [self-injurious behaviour (SIB), stereotypic behaviour and aggressive/destructive behaviour]. Materials and method: The "Questions about Behavioural Function" (QABF), the "Functional Assessment for…
Descriptors: Mental Retardation, Validity, Interrater Reliability, Rating Scales
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tenneij, Nienke H.; Koot, Hans M. – Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2007
Background: Achenbach & Rescorla (2003) recently developed the Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL) to assess psychopathology in the general population. The ABCL should be completed by a proxy informant. The use of proxy informants, instead of self-reporting, makes the ABCL potentially suitable for the assessment of psychopathology in adults with…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Mental Retardation, Validity, Interrater Reliability