Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Active Learning | 1 |
| Chemistry | 1 |
| Cooperative Learning | 1 |
| Honors Curriculum | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Learning Strategies | 1 |
| Learning Theories | 1 |
| Outcomes of Education | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Problem Solving | 1 |
| Program Implementation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Chemical Education | 1 |
Author
| Geva, Eitan | 1 |
| Gottfried, Amy | 1 |
| Hendrickson, Heidi P. | 1 |
| Jafari, Mina | 1 |
| Lenard, Michael | 1 |
| Mulvihill, Ellen | 1 |
| Welden, Alicia Rae | 1 |
| Williams, Kyle L. | 1 |
| Winograd, Blair | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Michigan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJafari, Mina; Welden, Alicia Rae; Williams, Kyle L.; Winograd, Blair; Mulvihill, Ellen; Hendrickson, Heidi P.; Lenard, Michael; Gottfried, Amy; Geva, Eitan – Journal of Chemical Education, 2017
In this paper, we report on the implementation of a novel compute-to-learn pedagogy, which is based upon the theories of situated cognition and meaningful learning. The "compute-to-learn" pedagogy is designed to simulate an authentic research experience as part of the undergraduate curriculum, including project development, teamwork,…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Chemistry, Teaching Methods, Simulation
