Descriptor
Psychometrics | 6 |
Test Interpretation | 6 |
Personality Measures | 3 |
Test Validity | 3 |
Psychological Evaluation | 2 |
Sex Differences | 2 |
Statistical Significance | 2 |
Adults | 1 |
Affective Measures | 1 |
Alcoholism | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Clinical Psychology | 6 |
Author
Caplan, Marc | 1 |
Colligan, Robert C. | 1 |
Hattie, John A. | 1 |
Hays, Ron | 1 |
Labeck, Louis J. | 1 |
Newmark, Charles S. | 1 |
Sharpley, Christopher F. | 1 |
Stacy, Alan | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Minnesota Multiphasic… | 4 |
Tennessee Self Concept Scale | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Hays, Ron; Stacy, Alan – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1983
Critiqued and reanalyzed a recent study of the validity of five Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) alcoholism scales. The original study concluded that these scales were invalid in terms of classifying patients in regard to alcoholic status. Reanalysis provides evidence for the validity of four of the five scales. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: Alcoholism, Classification, Individual Differences, Patients

Colligan, Robert C.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980
Raw scores for the clinical scales of MMPI can be changed to T scores by linear transformation. If the underlying distributions of raw scores are not distributed normally, one cannot assume the traditional point of significance. Suggests that clinicians consider more conservative interpretation for some scales. (Author)
Descriptors: Adults, Linear Programing, Personality Measures, Psychometrics

Labeck, Louis J.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1983
Examines the validity of a Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory code type interpretive program. Results showed the system was highly rated by three independent experienced clinicians. The program can be used in validating other automated test interpretation systems. Feedback by expert judges can be used to improve such systems. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Personality Measures, Psychological Evaluation, Psychometrics

Newmark, Charles S.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982
Assessed and compared the interpretive accuracy of the standard Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and two MMPI short forms with a sample of geriatric psychiatric inpatients. Psychiatric teams evaluated the accuracy of the interpretation. Standard form interpretations were rated significantly greater than the interpretations…
Descriptors: Clinical Psychology, Comparative Testing, Geriatrics, Institutionalized Persons

Sharpley, Christopher F.; Hattie, John A. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1983
Examined the Tennessee Self Concept Scale for cultural and sex differences with college students (N=202). Data did not support generalizability of normed data across cultures. Analysis showed significant differences according to sex of respondent, and raised questions concerning the validity of certain clinical uses and interpretations of the…
Descriptors: College Students, Cultural Differences, Foreign Countries, Higher Education

Caplan, Marc; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1982
In two trials, subjects completed the Depression Adjective Checklist as they felt, or were instructed to "fake good,""fake bad," or "fake average." Discussed findings for "fake bad" and "fake good" in terms of ability of an examiner to detect the manipulative set through grossly deviant scores.…
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Comparative Analysis, Depression (Psychology), Psychometrics