Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
Journal of College Science… | 4 |
Author
Herreid, Clyde Freeman | 2 |
Brickman, Peggy | 1 |
DeRei, Kristie | 1 |
Glynn, Shawn | 1 |
Graybeal, Geoffrey | 1 |
Smith, Frank A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Brickman, Peggy; Glynn, Shawn; Graybeal, Geoffrey – Journal of College Science Teaching, 2008
Strategically introducing students to a controversial science case--before they read it, watch it, or listen to it--motivates them to learn from it and paves the way for successful discussion and debate. A strategic introduction also provides an opportunity for the instructor to demonstrate scientific reasoning and share guidelines for the…
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Science Instruction, Teaching Methods, Case Method (Teaching Technique)
Herreid, Clyde Freeman; DeRei, Kristie – Journal of College Science Teaching, 2007
Classroom debates used to be familiar exercises to students schooled in past generations. In this article, the authors describe the technique called "intimate debate". To cooperative learning specialists, the technique is known as "structured debate" or "constructive debate". It is a powerful method for dealing with case topics that involve…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Marijuana, Cooperative Learning, Controversial Issues (Course Content)

Herreid, Clyde Freeman – Journal of College Science Teaching, 1996
Introduces a dynamic form of the case instruction method that involves debate and compromise. Discusses two versions of structured controversy and presents an example of structured controversy that involves the use of DNA fingerprinting in forensic medicine. (JRH)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Critical Thinking, Debate, DNA
Smith, Frank A. – Journal of College Science Teaching, 2006
A narrative in the form of a courtroom trial is used to compare evidence on the nature of light as part of an introductory college physics course. Prosecuting and defense attorneys present evidence for and against competing wave and particle hypotheses for light behavior while students play the roles of jurors. (Contains 5 figures.)
Descriptors: Physics, Light, Case Method (Teaching Technique), Persuasive Discourse