Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Learner Engagement | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| Nursing Education | 1 |
| Nursing Students | 1 |
| Outcomes of Education | 1 |
| Self Management | 1 |
Source
| Journal of Computer Assisted… | 1 |
Author
| Andrea Carr | 1 |
| Annette Saunders | 1 |
| Carolyn King | 1 |
| Denis Visentin | 1 |
| Iain Atherton | 1 |
| Richard Say | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkRichard Say; Denis Visentin; Annette Saunders; Iain Atherton; Andrea Carr; Carolyn King – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Formative online multiple-choice tests are ubiquitous in higher education and potentially powerful learning tools. However, commonly used feedback approaches in online multiple-choice tests can discourage meaningful engagement and enable strategies, such as trial-and-error, that circumvent intended learning outcomes. These strategies…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Self Management, Formative Evaluation, Multiple Choice Tests
