Publication Date
In 2025 | 3 |
Since 2024 | 9 |
Descriptor
Source
Journal of Computer Assisted… | 9 |
Author
Hendrik Drachsler | 2 |
Ioana Jivet | 2 |
Andrea Carr | 1 |
Andreas Frey | 1 |
Annette Saunders | 1 |
Aron Fink | 1 |
Barbi Svetec | 1 |
Blaženka Divjak | 1 |
Carolyn King | 1 |
Damir Horvat | 1 |
Daniele Di Mitri | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Research | 9 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 5 |
Postsecondary Education | 5 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Blaženka Divjak; Barbi Svetec; Damir Horvat – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Sound learning design should be based on the constructive alignment of intended learning outcomes (LOs), teaching and learning activities and formative and summative assessment. Assessment validity strongly relies on its alignment with LOs. Valid and reliable formative assessment can be analysed as a predictor of students' academic…
Descriptors: Automation, Formative Evaluation, Test Validity, Test Reliability
Onur Karademir; Daniele Di Mitri; Jan Schneider; Ioana Jivet; Jörn Allmang; Sebastian Gombert; Marcus Kubsch; Knut Neumann; Hendrik Drachsler – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Teacher dashboards can help secondary school teachers manage online learning activities and inform instructional decisions by visualising information about class learning. However, when designing teacher dashboards, it is not trivial to choose which information to display, because not all of the vast amount of information retrieved…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Secondary School Teachers, Educational Technology, Design
Elisabeth Bauer; Michael Sailer; Frank Niklas; Samuel Greiff; Sven Sarbu-Rothsching; Jan M. Zottmann; Jan Kiesewetter; Matthias Stadler; Martin R. Fischer; Tina Seidel; Detlef Urhahne; Maximilian Sailer; Frank Fischer – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Artificial intelligence, particularly natural language processing (NLP), enables automating the formative assessment of written task solutions to provide adaptive feedback automatically. A laboratory study found that, compared with static feedback (an expert solution), adaptive feedback automated through artificial neural networks…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Feedback (Response), Computer Simulation, Natural Language Processing
Richard Say; Denis Visentin; Annette Saunders; Iain Atherton; Andrea Carr; Carolyn King – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Formative online multiple-choice tests are ubiquitous in higher education and potentially powerful learning tools. However, commonly used feedback approaches in online multiple-choice tests can discourage meaningful engagement and enable strategies, such as trial-and-error, that circumvent intended learning outcomes. These strategies…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Self Management, Formative Evaluation, Multiple Choice Tests
Okan Bulut; Guher Gorgun; Seyma Nur Yildirim-Erbasli – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Research shows that how formative assessments are operationalized plays a crucial role in shaping their engagement with formative assessments, thereby impacting their effectiveness in predicting academic achievement. Mandatory assessments can ensure consistent student participation, leading to better tracking of learning progress.…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Academic Achievement, Student Participation, Learning Processes
Yue Huang; Joshua Wilson – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems, used as formative assessment tools in writing classrooms, are promising for enhancing instruction and improving student performance. Although meta-analytic evidence supports AWE's effectiveness in various contexts, research on its effectiveness in the U.S. K-12 setting has lagged behind its…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Skills, Writing Tests, Writing Instruction
Joshua Weidlich; Aron Fink; Ioana Jivet; Jane Yau; Tornike Giorgashvili; Hendrik Drachsler; Andreas Frey – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Developments in educational technology and learning analytics make it possible to automatically formulate and deploy personalized formative feedback to learners at scale. However, to be effective, the motivational and emotional impacts of such automated and personalized feedback need to be considered. The literature on feedback…
Descriptors: Emotional Response, Student Motivation, Feedback (Response), Automation
Jewoong Moon; Sheunghyun Yeo; Seyyed Kazem Banihashem; Omid Noroozi – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Traditionally, understanding students' learning dynamics, collaboration, emotions, and their impact on performance has posed challenges in formative assessment. The complexity of monitoring and assessing these factors have often limited the depth and breadth of insights. Objectives: This study aims to explore the potential of…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Nonverbal Communication, Outcomes of Education, Learning Analytics
Luzhen Tang; Kejie Shen; Huixiao Le; Yuan Shen; Shufang Tan; Yueying Zhao; Torsten Juelich; Xinyu Li; Dragan Gaševic; Yizhou Fan – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Learners' writing skills are critical to their academic and professional development. Previous studies have shown that learners' self-assessment during writing is essential for assessing their writing products and monitoring their writing processes. However, conducting practical self-assessments of writing remains challenging for…
Descriptors: Self Evaluation (Individuals), Formative Evaluation, Writing Assignments, Writing Skills