Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
Journal of Computer Assisted… | 3 |
Author
Bird, R. J. | 1 |
Detlef Urhahne | 1 |
Elisabeth Bauer | 1 |
Frank Fischer | 1 |
Frank Niklas | 1 |
Hewson, C. | 1 |
Jan Kiesewetter | 1 |
Jan M. Zottmann | 1 |
Martin R. Fischer | 1 |
Matthias Stadler | 1 |
Maximilian Sailer | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Germany | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Elisabeth Bauer; Michael Sailer; Frank Niklas; Samuel Greiff; Sven Sarbu-Rothsching; Jan M. Zottmann; Jan Kiesewetter; Matthias Stadler; Martin R. Fischer; Tina Seidel; Detlef Urhahne; Maximilian Sailer; Frank Fischer – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Artificial intelligence, particularly natural language processing (NLP), enables automating the formative assessment of written task solutions to provide adaptive feedback automatically. A laboratory study found that, compared with static feedback (an expert solution), adaptive feedback automated through artificial neural networks…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Feedback (Response), Computer Simulation, Natural Language Processing
McDonald, J.; Bird, R. J.; Zouaq, A.; Moskal, A. C. M. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2017
In large class settings, individualized student-teacher interaction is difficult. However, teaching interactions (e.g., formative feedback) are central to encouraging deep approaches to learning. While there has been progress in automatic short-answer grading, analysing student responses to support formative feedback at scale is arguably some way…
Descriptors: College Students, Health Sciences, Teacher Student Relationship, Large Group Instruction
Hewson, C. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2012
To address concerns raised regarding the use of online course-based summative assessment methods, a quasi-experimental design was implemented in which students who completed a summative assessment either online or offline were compared on performance scores when using their self-reported "preferred" or "non-preferred" modes.…
Descriptors: Summative Evaluation, Followup Studies, Validity, Student Attitudes