Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Internet | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Lecture Method | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Computer Assisted… | 1 |
Author
| Joordens, S. | 1 |
| Pare, D. E. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPare, D. E.; Joordens, S. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2008
As class sizes increase, methods of assessments shift from costly traditional approaches (e.g. expert-graded writing assignments) to more economic and logistically feasible methods (e.g. multiple-choice testing, computer-automated scoring, or peer assessment). While each method of assessment has its merits, it is peer assessment in particular,…
Descriptors: Writing Assignments, Undergraduate Students, Teaching Assistants, Peer Evaluation
