Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Source
Journal of Computer Assisted… | 8 |
Author
Andrea Carr | 1 |
Annette Saunders | 1 |
Anquetil, Éric | 1 |
Baral, Sami | 1 |
Benachamardi, Priyanka | 1 |
Botelho, Anthony | 1 |
Bulut, Okan | 1 |
Candel, Carmen | 1 |
Carolyn King | 1 |
Cerdán, Raquel | 1 |
Daniels, Lia M. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Richard Say; Denis Visentin; Annette Saunders; Iain Atherton; Andrea Carr; Carolyn King – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: Formative online multiple-choice tests are ubiquitous in higher education and potentially powerful learning tools. However, commonly used feedback approaches in online multiple-choice tests can discourage meaningful engagement and enable strategies, such as trial-and-error, that circumvent intended learning outcomes. These strategies…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Self Management, Formative Evaluation, Multiple Choice Tests
Ute Mertens; Marlit A. Lindner – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Educational assessments increasingly shift towards computer-based formats. Many studies have explored how different types of automated feedback affect learning. However, few studies have investigated how digital performance feedback affects test takers' ratings of affective-motivational reactions during a testing session. Method: In…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Computer Assisted Testing, Automation, Feedback (Response)
Botelho, Anthony; Baral, Sami; Erickson, John A.; Benachamardi, Priyanka; Heffernan, Neil T. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2023
Background: Teachers often rely on the use of open-ended questions to assess students' conceptual understanding of assigned content. Particularly in the context of mathematics; teachers use these types of questions to gain insight into the processes and strategies adopted by students in solving mathematical problems beyond what is possible through…
Descriptors: Natural Language Processing, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Assisted Testing, Mathematics Tests
Candel, Carmen; Máñez, Ignacio; Cerdán, Raquel; Vidal-Abarca, Eduardo – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2021
Elaborative feedback (EF) containing explanations on students' responses benefits learning. Computer-based environments provide learners with EF in different ways, for example, on an immediate question-by-question basis or after answering a set of questions. Recent findings also suggest that delaying EF enhances learning. However, it is unclear to…
Descriptors: Secondary School Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Feedback (Response)
Daniels, Lia M.; Bulut, Okan – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2020
In computer-based testing (CBT) environments instructors can provide students with feedback immediately. Commonly, instructors give students their percentage correct without additional descriptive feedback. Our objectives were (a) to compare students' perceived usefulness of a percentage-only score report vs. a descriptive feedback report in a CBT…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Feedback (Response), Value Judgment, Student Attitudes
Michinov, Nicolas; Anquetil, Éric; Michinov, Estelle – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2020
Peer Instruction is an active learning method widely used in higher education, whereby students answer a series of questions twice, once before and once after peer discussion. There is an ongoing debate as to whether a collective feedback should be given after the students' initial answer, and if so, how the frequently observed group conformity…
Descriptors: Peer Teaching, Feedback (Response), Discussion, Active Learning
McLaughlin, T.; Yan, Z. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2017
This article is a review of literature on online formative assessment (OFA). It includes a narrative summary that synthesizes the research on the diverse delivery methods of OFA, as well as the empirical literature regarding the strong psychological benefits and limitations. Online formative assessment can be delivered using many traditional…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Computer Assisted Testing, Delivery Systems, Achievement Gains
Sitthiworachart, J.; Joy, M. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2008
Active learning is considered by many academics as an important and effective learning strategy. Assessment is integrated in learning as a tool for learning, but traditional assessment methods often encourage surface learning (passive learning) rather than deep learning (active learning). Peer assessment is a method of motivating students,…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Learning Strategies, Active Learning, Programming