NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Broek, G. S. E.; Segers, E.; Verhoeven, L. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2014
A common assumption in multimedia design is that audio-visual materials with pictures and spoken narrations lead to better learning outcomes than visual-only materials with pictures and on-screen text. The present study questions the generalizability of this modality effect. We explored how modality effects change over time, taking into account…
Descriptors: Multimedia Instruction, Intermode Differences, College Students, Retention (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mason, L.; Scheiter, K.; Tornatora, M. C. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2017
This study used eye movement modeling examples (EMME) to support students' integrative processing of verbal and graphical information during the reading of an illustrated text. EMME consists of a replay of eye movements of a model superimposed onto the materials that are processed for accomplishing the task. Specifically, the study investigated…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Multimedia Materials, Multimedia Instruction, Computer Graphics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Witteman, M. J.; Segers, E. – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2010
The modality learning effect proposes that learning is enhanced when information is presented in both the visual and the auditory domains (e.g. pictures and spoken information) compared with presenting information solely in the visual channel (e.g. pictures and written text). Most of the evidence for this effect comes from adults in a laboratory…
Descriptors: Intervention, Individual Differences, Elementary School Students, Adults