Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Journal of Curriculum Studies | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
China | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zhao, Weili – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2020
China's 2017 'classroom revolution' call intends to "transform" current teacher-centered pedagogies with brand-new philosophies and technologies. As a new entry point for classroom research, I problematize a naturalized (mis)belief--" teacher-centered (Confucian) didactic pedagogies are not conducive to critical thinking…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Educational Change, Epistemology, Confucianism

Newmann, Fred M. – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1990
Reports a research project with the goal of learning about the barriers to promoting higher-order thinking in high school social studies. Compares social studies departments that are successful at promoting higher-order thinking with less successful departments. Describes the technical aspects in the development and use of the 17 observational…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Critical Thinking, Curriculum Development

Hertzog, Nancy B. – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1997
Uses the case study of a new private school to investigate the implementation of a curriculum designed to incorporate project-oriented, problem-based learning, and a constructivist approach to challenge gifted learners. Discusses the origins of the school, influencing factors, and implications for initiating similar efforts. (MJP)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Active Learning, Constructivism (Learning), Critical Thinking

Popkewitz, Thomas S. – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1997
Delineates two traditional assumptions of educational research: (1) social progress is tied to an evolutionary conception of change and (2) inquiry must identify actors as causal agents who create or suppress change. Argues that both assumptions are grounded in the effects of power and modernity and are complicit in social regulation. (MJP)
Descriptors: Agenda Setting, Change Agents, Consciousness Raising, Critical Theory