NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 38 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Casabianca, Jodi M.; Donoghue, John R.; Shin, Hyo Jeong; Chao, Szu-Fu; Choi, Ikkyu – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Using item-response theory to model rater effects provides an alternative solution for rater monitoring and diagnosis, compared to using standard performance metrics. In order to fit such models, the ratings data must be sufficiently connected in order to estimate rater effects. Due to popular rating designs used in large-scale testing scenarios,…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Alternative Assessment, Evaluators, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ferrara, Steve; Qunbar, Saed – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2022
In this article, we argue that automated scoring engines should be transparent and construct relevant--that is, as much as is currently feasible. Many current automated scoring engines cannot achieve high degrees of scoring accuracy without allowing in some features that may not be easily explained and understood and may not be obviously and…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Scoring, Essays, Automation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peter Baldwin; Victoria Yaneva; Kai North; Le An Ha; Yiyun Zhou; Alex J. Mechaber; Brian E. Clauser – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Recent developments in the use of large-language models have led to substantial improvements in the accuracy of content-based automated scoring of free-text responses. The reported accuracy levels suggest that automated systems could have widespread applicability in assessment. However, before they are used in operational testing, other aspects of…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Scoring, Computational Linguistics, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
DeCarlo, Lawrence T.; Zhou, Xiaoliang – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2021
In signal detection rater models for constructed response (CR) scoring, it is assumed that raters discriminate equally well between different latent classes defined by the scoring rubric. An extended model that relaxes this assumption is introduced; the model recognizes that a rater may not discriminate equally well between some of the scoring…
Descriptors: Scoring, Models, Bias, Perception
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yuan, Lu; Huang, Yingshi; Li, Shuhang; Chen, Ping – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2023
Online calibration is a key technology for item calibration in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and has been widely used in various forms of CAT, including unidimensional CAT, multidimensional CAT (MCAT), CAT with polytomously scored items, and cognitive diagnostic CAT. However, as multidimensional and polytomous assessment data become more…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Computation, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wallace N. Pinto Jr.; Jinnie Shin – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
In recent years, the application of explainability techniques to automated essay scoring and automated short-answer grading (ASAG) models, particularly those based on transformer architectures, has gained significant attention. However, the reliability and consistency of these techniques remain underexplored. This study systematically investigates…
Descriptors: Automation, Grading, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shermis, Mark D. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2022
One of the challenges of discussing validity arguments for machine scoring of essays centers on the absence of a commonly held definition and theory of good writing. At best, the algorithms attempt to measure select attributes of writing and calibrate them against human ratings with the goal of accurate prediction of scores for new essays.…
Descriptors: Scoring, Essays, Validity, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wise, Steven L.; Kuhfeld, Megan R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2021
There has been a growing research interest in the identification and management of disengaged test taking, which poses a validity threat that is particularly prevalent with low-stakes tests. This study investigated effort-moderated (E-M) scoring, in which item responses classified as rapid guesses are identified and excluded from scoring. Using…
Descriptors: Scoring, Data Use, Response Style (Tests), Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kylie Gorney; Sandip Sinharay – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Although there exists an extensive amount of research on subscores and their properties, limited research has been conducted on categorical subscores and their interpretations. In this paper, we focus on the claim of Feinberg and von Davier that categorical subscores are useful for remediation and instructional purposes. We investigate this claim…
Descriptors: Tests, Scores, Test Interpretation, Alternative Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baldwin, Peter; Clauser, Brian E. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2022
While score comparability across test forms typically relies on common (or randomly equivalent) examinees or items, innovations in item formats, test delivery, and efforts to extend the range of score interpretation may require a special data collection before examinees or items can be used in this way--or may be incompatible with common examinee…
Descriptors: Scoring, Testing, Test Items, Test Format
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guo, Wenjing; Wind, Stefanie A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2021
The use of mixed-format tests made up of multiple-choice (MC) items and constructed response (CR) items is popular in large-scale testing programs, including the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and many district- and state-level assessments in the United States. Rater effects, or raters' scoring tendencies that result in…
Descriptors: Test Format, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Puhan, Gautam; Kim, Sooyeon – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2022
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, at-home testing has become a popular delivery mode in many testing programs. When programs offer at-home testing to expand their service, the score comparability between test takers testing remotely and those testing in a test center is critical. This article summarizes statistical procedures that could be…
Descriptors: Scores, Scoring, Comparative Analysis, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dorsey, David W.; Michaels, Hillary R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2022
We have dramatically advanced our ability to create rich, complex, and effective assessments across a range of uses through technology advancement. Artificial Intelligence (AI) enabled assessments represent one such area of advancement--one that has captured our collective interest and imagination. Scientists and practitioners within the domains…
Descriptors: Validity, Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lane, Suzanne – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2019
Rater-mediated assessments require the evaluation of the accuracy and consistency of the inferences made by the raters to ensure the validity of score interpretations and uses. Modeling rater response processes allows for a better understanding of how raters map their representations of the examinee performance to their representation of the…
Descriptors: Responses, Accuracy, Validity, Interrater Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hopster-den Otter, Dorien; Wools, Saskia; Eggen, Theo J. H. M.; Veldkamp, Bernard P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2019
In educational practice, test results are used for several purposes. However, validity research is especially focused on the validity of summative assessment. This article aimed to provide a general framework for validating formative assessment. The authors applied the argument-based approach to validation to the context of formative assessment.…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Test Validity, Scores, Inferences
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3