NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Liu, Shuchang; Cai, Yan; Tu, Dongbo – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2018
This study applied the mode of on-the-fly assembled multistage adaptive testing to cognitive diagnosis (CD-OMST). Several and several module assembly methods for CD-OMST were proposed and compared in terms of measurement precision, test security, and constrain management. The module assembly methods in the study included the maximum priority index…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Computer Security, Clinical Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Sooyeon; Moses, Tim; Yoo, Hanwook – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2015
This inquiry is an investigation of item response theory (IRT) proficiency estimators' accuracy under multistage testing (MST). We chose a two-stage MST design that includes four modules (one at Stage 1, three at Stage 2) and three difficulty paths (low, middle, high). We assembled various two-stage MST panels (i.e., forms) by manipulating two…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Item Response Theory, Computation, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yao, Lihua – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2014
The intent of this research was to find an item selection procedure in the multidimensional computer adaptive testing (CAT) framework that yielded higher precision for both the domain and composite abilities, had a higher usage of the item pool, and controlled the exposure rate. Five multidimensional CAT item selection procedures (minimum angle;…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pohl, Steffi – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2013
This article introduces longitudinal multistage testing (lMST), a special form of multistage testing (MST), as a method for adaptive testing in longitudinal large-scale studies. In lMST designs, test forms of different difficulty levels are used, whereas the values on a pretest determine the routing to these test forms. Since lMST allows for…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Longitudinal Studies, Difficulty Level, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhang, Jinming; Li, Jie – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2016
An IRT-based sequential procedure is developed to monitor items for enhancing test security. The procedure uses a series of statistical hypothesis tests to examine whether the statistical characteristics of each item under inspection have changed significantly during CAT administration. This procedure is compared with a previously developed…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items, Difficulty Level, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Chun; Chang, Hua-Hua; Huebner, Alan – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2011
This paper proposes two new item selection methods for cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing: the restrictive progressive method and the restrictive threshold method. They are built upon the posterior weighted Kullback-Leibler (KL) information index but include additional stochastic components either in the item selection index or in…
Descriptors: Test Items, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Deng, Hui; Ansley, Timothy; Chang, Hua-Hua – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2010
In this study we evaluated and compared three item selection procedures: the maximum Fisher information procedure (F), the a-stratified multistage computer adaptive testing (CAT) (STR), and a refined stratification procedure that allows more items to be selected from the high a strata and fewer items from the low a strata (USTR), along with…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Selection, Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Revuelta, Javier; Ponsoda, Vicente – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Proposes two new methods for item-exposure control, the Progressive method and the Restricted Maximum Information method. Compares both methods with six other item-selection methods. Discusses advantages of the two new methods and the usefulness of combining them. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schnipke, Deborah L.; Green, Bert F. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1995
Two item selection algorithms, one based on maximal differentiation between examinees and one based on item response theory and maximum information for each examinee, were compared in simulated linear and adaptive tests of cognitive ability. Adaptive tests based on maximum information were clearly superior. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Comparative Analysis, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wang, Tianyou; Kolen, Michael J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2001
Reviews research literature on comparability issues in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and synthesizes issues specific to comparability and test security. Develops a framework for evaluating comparability that contains three categories of criteria: (1) validity; (2) psychometric property/reliability; and (3) statistical assumption/test…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lei, Pui-Wa; Chen, Shu-Ying; Yu, Lan – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2006
Mantel-Haenszel and SIBTEST, which have known difficulty in detecting non-unidirectional differential item functioning (DIF), have been adapted with some success for computerized adaptive testing (CAT). This study adapts logistic regression (LR) and the item-response-theory-likelihood-ratio test (IRT-LRT), capable of detecting both unidirectional…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Test Bias, Computer Assisted Testing, Multiple Regression Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Spray, Judith A.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1989
Findings of studies examining the effects of presentation media on item characteristics are reviewed. The effect of medium of presentation independent of adaptive methodology in computer-assisted testing was studied through tests of 763 Marine trainees. Conditions necessary for score equivalence between item presentation media are described. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Military Personnel
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
De Ayala, R. J.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1990
F. M. Lord's flexilevel, computerized adaptive testing (CAT) procedure was compared to an item-response theory-based CAT procedure that uses Bayesian ability estimation with various standard errors of estimates used for terminating the test. Ability estimates of flexilevel CATs were as accurate as were those of Bayesian CATs. (TJH)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vispoel, Walter P.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1997
Efficiency, precision, and concurrent validity of results from adaptive and fixed-item music listening tests were studied using: (1) 2,200 simulated examinees; (2) 204 live examinees; and (3) 172 live examinees. Results support the usefulness of adaptive tests for measuring skills that require aurally produced items. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Adults, College Students, Comparative Analysis