NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhang, Jinming; Li, Jie – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2016
An IRT-based sequential procedure is developed to monitor items for enhancing test security. The procedure uses a series of statistical hypothesis tests to examine whether the statistical characteristics of each item under inspection have changed significantly during CAT administration. This procedure is compared with a previously developed…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items, Difficulty Level, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Han, Kyung T. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2012
Successful administration of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) programs in educational settings requires that test security and item exposure control issues be taken seriously. Developing an item selection algorithm that strikes the right balance between test precision and level of item pool utilization is the key to successful implementation…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ban, Jae-Chun; Hanson, Bradley A.; Yi, Qing; Harris, Deborah J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2002
Compared three online pretest calibration scaling methods through simulation: (1) marginal maximum likelihood with one expectation maximization (EM) cycle (OEM) method; (2) marginal maximum likelihood with multiple EM cycles (MEM); and (3) M. Stocking's method B. MEM produced the smallest average total error in parameter estimation; OEM yielded…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Error of Measurement, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Online Systems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
De Ayala, R. J.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1990
F. M. Lord's flexilevel, computerized adaptive testing (CAT) procedure was compared to an item-response theory-based CAT procedure that uses Bayesian ability estimation with various standard errors of estimates used for terminating the test. Ability estimates of flexilevel CATs were as accurate as were those of Bayesian CATs. (TJH)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis