NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Seonghoon; Feldt, Leonard S. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2008
This article extends the Bonett (2003a) approach to testing the equality of alpha coefficients from two independent samples to the case of m [greater than or equal] 2 independent samples. The extended Fisher-Bonett test and its competitor, the Hakstian-Whalen (1976) test, are illustrated with numerical examples of both hypothesis testing and power…
Descriptors: Tests, Comparative Analysis, Hypothesis Testing, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kamata, Akihito; Tate, Richard – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2005
The goal of this study was the development of a procedure to predict the equating error associated with the long-term equating method of Tate (2003) for mixed-format tests. An expression for the determination of the error of an equating based on multiple links using the error for the component links was derived and illustrated with simulated data.…
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Item Response Theory, Test Format, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hambleton, Ronald K.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1993
Item parameter estimation errors in test development are highlighted. The problem is illustrated with several simulated data sets, and a conservative solution is offered for addressing the problem in item response theory test development practice. Steps that reduce the problem of capitalizing on chance in item selections are suggested. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Item Banks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
De Ayala, R. J.; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1990
F. M. Lord's flexilevel, computerized adaptive testing (CAT) procedure was compared to an item-response theory-based CAT procedure that uses Bayesian ability estimation with various standard errors of estimates used for terminating the test. Ability estimates of flexilevel CATs were as accurate as were those of Bayesian CATs. (TJH)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Bayesian Statistics, Comparative Analysis