Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 5 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
Selection | 5 |
Test Items | 5 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Item Banks | 2 |
Methods | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Efficiency | 1 |
Error of Measurement | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Educational… | 5 |
Author
Ansley, Timothy | 1 |
Chang, Hua-Hua | 1 |
Chen, Chia-Wen | 1 |
Chiu, Ming Ming | 1 |
Deng, Hui | 1 |
Han, Kyung T. | 1 |
Ponsoda, Vicente | 1 |
Revuelta, Javier | 1 |
Ro, Sage | 1 |
Wang, Wen-Chung | 1 |
Yao, Lihua | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Chen, Chia-Wen; Wang, Wen-Chung; Chiu, Ming Ming; Ro, Sage – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2020
The use of computerized adaptive testing algorithms for ranking items (e.g., college preferences, career choices) involves two major challenges: unacceptably high computation times (selecting from a large item pool with many dimensions) and biased results (enhanced preferences or intensified examinee responses because of repeated statements across…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Selection
Yao, Lihua – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2014
The intent of this research was to find an item selection procedure in the multidimensional computer adaptive testing (CAT) framework that yielded higher precision for both the domain and composite abilities, had a higher usage of the item pool, and controlled the exposure rate. Five multidimensional CAT item selection procedures (minimum angle;…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Selection
Han, Kyung T. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2012
Successful administration of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) programs in educational settings requires that test security and item exposure control issues be taken seriously. Developing an item selection algorithm that strikes the right balance between test precision and level of item pool utilization is the key to successful implementation…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Test Items, Selection
Deng, Hui; Ansley, Timothy; Chang, Hua-Hua – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2010
In this study we evaluated and compared three item selection procedures: the maximum Fisher information procedure (F), the a-stratified multistage computer adaptive testing (CAT) (STR), and a refined stratification procedure that allows more items to be selected from the high a strata and fewer items from the low a strata (USTR), along with…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Selection, Methods

Revuelta, Javier; Ponsoda, Vicente – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Proposes two new methods for item-exposure control, the Progressive method and the Restricted Maximum Information method. Compares both methods with six other item-selection methods. Discusses advantages of the two new methods and the usefulness of combining them. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Selection