Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Test Content | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Test Construction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Book/Product Reviews | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedEignor, Daniel R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1997
The authors of the "Guidelines," a task force of eight, intend to present an organized list of features to be considered in reporting or evaluating computerized-adaptive assessments. Apart from a few weaknesses, the book is a useful and complete document that will be very helpful to test developers. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines
Direct linkChen, Shu-Ying; Ankenman, Robert D. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of four item selection rules--(1) Fisher information (F), (2) Fisher information with a posterior distribution (FP), (3) Kullback-Leibler information with a posterior distribution (KP), and (4) completely randomized item selection (RN)--with respect to the precision of trait estimation and the…
Descriptors: Test Length, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Selection
