Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 3 |
| Testing Problems | 3 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 2 |
| Simulation | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Answer Keys | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Guessing (Tests) | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Information Security | 1 |
| Mathematical Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hyeryung Lee; Walter P. Vispoel – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Traditional methods for detecting cheating on assessments tend to focus on either identifying cheaters or compromised items in isolation, overlooking their interconnection. In this study, we present a novel biclustering approach that simultaneously detects both cheaters and compromised items by identifying coherent subgroups of examinees and items…
Descriptors: Identification, Cheating, Test Wiseness, Test Items
Peer reviewedSotaridona, Leonardo S.; Meijer, Rob R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2003
Proposed two new indices to detect answer copying on a multiple choice test and conducted a simulation study to investigate the usefulness of both indexes. Discusses conditions under which the proposed indexes can be useful. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, Simulation, Testing Problems
Peer reviewedRoberts, Dennis M. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1987
This study examines a score-difference model for the detection of cheating based on the difference between two scores for an examinee: one based on the appropriate scoring key and another based on an alternative, inappropriate key. It argues that the score-difference method could falsely accuse students as cheaters. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: Answer Keys, Cheating, Mathematical Models, Multiple Choice Tests

Direct link
