Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Gifted | 2 |
| Individual Differences | 2 |
| Academic Ability | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| General Education | 1 |
| Human Body | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Language Acquisition | 1 |
| Language Skills | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Educational… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Differential Aptitude Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkBerninger, Virginia W.; Abbott, Robert D. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2010
Age-normed tests of listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression were administered in Grades 1 (n = 128), 3, and 5, or 3 (n = 113), 5, and 7. Confirmatory factor analyses compared 1- and 4-factor models at each grade level and supported a 4-factor model of language by ear, mouth, eye, and hand. Multiple…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Listening Comprehension, Speech Communication, Gifted
Peer reviewedShea, Daniel L.; Lubinski, David; Benbow, Camilla P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001
At age 13, students scoring at the top 0.5% in general intelligence completed the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT), Mathematics and Verbal subtests, and the Differential Aptitude Test (DAT) Space Relations (SR) and Mechanical Reasoning (MR) subtests. It appears that spatial ability assessments can complement contemporary talent search procedures.…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Adolescents, Gifted, Individual Differences
