Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Mathematics Achievement | 3 |
Peer Groups | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Self Concept | 2 |
Student Attitudes | 2 |
Ability Grouping | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
German | 1 |
Grade 9 | 1 |
Grades (Scholastic) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Educational… | 3 |
Author
Helm, Friederike | 2 |
Möller, Jens | 2 |
Jansen, Malte | 1 |
Junge, Fynn | 1 |
Müller-Kalthoff, Hanno | 1 |
Nagy, Nicole | 1 |
Schiefer, Irene M. | 1 |
Webb, Noreen M. | 1 |
Wolff, Fabian | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
High Schools | 2 |
Grade 9 | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Germany | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wolff, Fabian; Helm, Friederike; Junge, Fynn; Möller, Jens – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020
Dimensional comparisons are comparisons of one's accomplishments between two domains (e.g., comparisons between math and verbal achievements) that affect our self-perceptions in the domains compared with each other. In particular, dimensional comparisons explain the seemingly paradoxical finding, described in the internal/external frame of…
Descriptors: Models, Self Concept, Task Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Müller-Kalthoff, Hanno; Jansen, Malte; Schiefer, Irene M.; Helm, Friederike; Nagy, Nicole; Möller, Jens – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2017
Dimensional comparison theory (DCT; Möller & Marsh, 2013) assumes that students compare their academic achievement intraindividually across domains to form domain-specific self-concepts. Upward dimensional comparisons are believed to lead to lower self-concepts in the worse-off domain, while downward dimensional comparisons should lead to…
Descriptors: Self Concept, German, Mathematics Achievement, Comparative Analysis

Webb, Noreen M. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
The relationships among students and group characteristics, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups were investigated. Three categories of interaction were related to achievement: receiving no explanation in response to a question or error was negatively related to achievement; giving explanations and receiving explanations…
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Group Dynamics, Learning Processes, Mathematics Achievement