NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Arroyo, Ivon; Burleson, Winslow; Tai, Minghui; Muldner, Kasia; Woolf, Beverly Park – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2013
We provide evidence of persistent gender effects for students using advanced adaptive technology while learning mathematics. This technology improves each gender's learning and affective predispositions toward mathematics, but specific features in the software help either female or male students. Gender differences were seen in the students' style…
Descriptors: Gender Differences, Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Mathematics Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Duckworth, Angela L.; Quinn, Patrick D.; Tsukayama, Eli – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2012
The increasing prominence of standardized testing to assess student learning motivated the current investigation. We propose that standardized achievement test scores assess competencies determined more by intelligence than by self-control, whereas report card grades assess competencies determined more by self-control than by intelligence. In…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Intelligence, Grades (Scholastic), Report Cards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Plomin, Robert; Willerman, Lee – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975
Examines the modifiability and heritability of reflection-impulsivity as measured by Matching Familar Figures. A Cotwin control method was used to study the modifiability of reflection-impulsivity and a twin study to assess its heritability. (Author/DEP)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Nature Nurture Controversy, Preschool Education, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messer, Stanley – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Failure, Cognitive Processes, Problem Solving
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jones, Russell T.; Evans, Helen L. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980
Following trials in which children self-administered prizes, subjects in the stringent-demand group performed significantly better, during both the incentive and the extinction conditions, on time at task, number of correct problems, and number of problems attempted, than did subjects in lenient-demand and control groups. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Behavior Modification, Elementary Education, Elementary School Mathematics, Problem Solving