Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Algorithms | 2 |
Bayesian Statistics | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Generalization | 1 |
Guidance | 1 |
Models | 1 |
Sample Size | 1 |
Sampling | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Educational and… | 2 |
Author
Jean-Paul Fox | 1 |
Paciorek, Christopher J. | 1 |
Paganin, Sally | 1 |
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia | 1 |
Rodríguez, Abel | 1 |
Wehrhahn, Claudia | 1 |
de Valpine, Perry | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jean-Paul Fox – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2025
Popular item response theory (IRT) models are considered complex, mainly due to the inclusion of a random factor variable (latent variable). The random factor variable represents the incidental parameter problem since the number of parameters increases when including data of new persons. Therefore, IRT models require a specific estimation method…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Item Response Theory, Accuracy, Bayesian Statistics
Paganin, Sally; Paciorek, Christopher J.; Wehrhahn, Claudia; Rodríguez, Abel; Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia; de Valpine, Perry – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023
Item response theory (IRT) models typically rely on a normality assumption for subject-specific latent traits, which is often unrealistic in practice. Semiparametric extensions based on Dirichlet process mixtures (DPMs) offer a more flexible representation of the unknown distribution of the latent trait. However, the use of such models in the IRT…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Item Response Theory, Guidance, Evaluation Methods