NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Romero, Mauricio; Riascos, Álvaro; Jara, Diego – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2015
Multiple-choice exams are frequently used as an efficient and objective method to assess learning, but they are more vulnerable to answer copying than tests based on open questions. Several statistical tests (known as indices in the literature) have been proposed to detect cheating; however, to the best of our knowledge, they all lack mathematical…
Descriptors: Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, Statistical Analysis, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ostapczuk, Martin; Moshagen, Morten; Zhao, Zengmei; Musch, Jochen – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2009
Randomized response techniques (RRTs) aim to reduce social desirability bias in the assessment of sensitive attributes but differ regarding privacy protection. The less protection a design offers, the more likely respondents cheat by disobeying the instructions. In asymmetric RRT designs, respondents can play safe by giving a response that is…
Descriptors: Response Style (Tests), Social Desirability, Attitude Measures, Privacy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fox, Jean-Paul – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2005
The randomized response (RR) technique is often used to obtain answers on sensitive questions. A new method is developed to measure latent variables using the RR technique because direct questioning leads to biased results. Within the RR technique is the probability of the true response modeled by an item response theory (IRT) model. The RR…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Probability, Markov Processes