NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gorney, Kylie; Wollack, James A.; Sinharay, Sandip; Eckerly, Carol – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2023
Any time examinees have had access to items and/or answers prior to taking a test, the fairness of the test and validity of test score interpretations are threatened. Therefore, there is a high demand for procedures to detect both compromised items (CI) and examinees with preknowledge (EWP). In this article, we develop a procedure that uses item…
Descriptors: Scores, Test Validity, Test Items, Prior Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Quinn, David M.; Ho, Andrew D. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2021
The estimation of test score "gaps" and gap trends plays an important role in monitoring educational inequality. Researchers decompose gaps and gap changes into within- and between-school portions to generate evidence on the role schools play in shaping these inequalities. However, existing decomposition methods assume an equal-interval…
Descriptors: Scores, Tests, Achievement Gap, Equal Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gu, Zhengguo; Emons, Wilco H. M.; Sijtsma, Klaas – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2021
Clinical, medical, and health psychologists use difference scores obtained from pretest--posttest designs employing the same test to assess intraindividual change possibly caused by an intervention addressing, for example, anxiety, depression, eating disorder, or addiction. Reliability of difference scores is important for interpreting observed…
Descriptors: Test Reliability, Scores, Pretests Posttests, Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jeon, Minjeong; Rijmen, Frank; Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2013
The authors present a generalization of the multiple-group bifactor model that extends the classical bifactor model for categorical outcomes by relaxing the typical assumption of independence of the specific dimensions. In addition to the means and variances of all dimensions, the correlations among the specific dimensions are allowed to differ…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Generalization, Models, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Longford, Nicholas T. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2014
A method for medical screening is adapted to differential item functioning (DIF). Its essential elements are explicit declarations of the level of DIF that is acceptable and of the loss function that quantifies the consequences of the two kinds of inappropriate classification of an item. Instead of a single level and a single function, sets of…
Descriptors: Test Items, Test Bias, Simulation, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schuster, Christof; Yuan, Ke-Hai – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2011
Because of response disturbances such as guessing, cheating, or carelessness, item response models often can only approximate the "true" individual response probabilities. As a consequence, maximum-likelihood estimates of ability will be biased. Typically, the nature and extent to which response disturbances are present is unknown, and, therefore,…
Descriptors: Computation, Item Response Theory, Probability, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sinharay, Sandip; Dorans, Neil J.; Grant, Mary C.; Blew, Edwin O. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2009
Test administrators often face the challenge of detecting differential item functioning (DIF) with samples of size smaller than that recommended by experts. A Bayesian approach can incorporate, in the form of a prior distribution, existing information on the inference problem at hand, which yields more stable estimation, especially for small…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Computation, Bayesian Statistics, Data
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nandakumar, Ratna; Roussos, Louis – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2004
A new procedure, CATSIB, for assessing differential item functioning (DIF) on computerized adaptive tests (CATs) is proposed. CATSIB, a modified SIBTEST procedure, matches test takers on estimated ability and controls for impact-induced Type 1 error inflation by employing a CAT version of the IBTEST "regression correction." The…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Pretesting