There is a need for effect sizes that are readily interpretable by a broad audience. One index that might fill this need is [pi], which represents the proportion of scores in one group that exceed the mean of another group. The robustness of estimates of [pi] to violations of normality had not been explored. Using simulated data, three estimates…

Nonparametric and robust statistics (those using trimmed means and Winsorized variances) were compared for their ability to detect treatment effects in the two-sample case. The use of two specialized tests, designed to be sensitive to treatment effects when data distributions are skewed to the right, is not supported by the analyses. (SLD)

D. W. Zimmerman argues that the interpretation by J. D. Gibbons and S. Chakraborti of recent simulation results and their recommendations are misleading and suggests use of an alternate test when homogeneity of variance and normality are violated. Gibbons and Chakraborti review their differences with Zimmerman's position. (SLD)