Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Error Patterns | 3 |
Experimental Psychology | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Undergraduate Students | 2 |
Visual Stimuli | 2 |
Bias | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Control Groups | 1 |
Criteria | 1 |
Emotional Response | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 3 |
Author
Forster, Jens | 1 |
Hansson, Goran | 1 |
Horowitz, Todd S. | 1 |
Juslin, Peter | 1 |
Kenner, Naomi M. | 1 |
Kibbi, Nour | 1 |
Liberman, Nira | 1 |
Nilsson, Hakan | 1 |
Place, Skyler S. | 1 |
Shapira, Oren | 1 |
Van Wert, Michael J. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nilsson, Hakan; Winman, Anders; Juslin, Peter; Hansson, Goran – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2009
This article explores the configural weighted average (CWA) hypothesis suggesting that extension biases, like conjunction and disjunction errors, occur because people estimate compound probabilities by taking a CWA of the constituent probabilities. The hypothesis suggests a process consistent with well-known cognitive constraints, which…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Prediction, Probability, Bias
Wolfe, Jeremy M.; Horowitz, Todd S.; Van Wert, Michael J.; Kenner, Naomi M.; Place, Skyler S.; Kibbi, Nour – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2007
In visual search tasks, observers look for targets in displays containing distractors. Likelihood that targets will be missed varies with target prevalence, the frequency with which targets are presented across trials. Miss error rates are much higher at low target prevalence (1%-2%) than at high prevalence (50%). Unfortunately, low prevalence is…
Descriptors: Incidence, Feedback (Response), Search Strategies, Visual Stimuli
Forster, Jens; Liberman, Nira; Shapira, Oren – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2009
Six experiments examined whether novelty versus familiarity influences global versus local processing styles. Novelty and familiarity were manipulated by either framing a task as new versus familiar or by asking participants to reflect upon novel versus familiar events prior to the task (i.e., procedural priming). In Experiments 1-3, global…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Familiarity, Novelty (Stimulus Dimension), Cognitive Processes