NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
DeCaro, Marci S.; Thomas, Robin D.; Albert, Neil B.; Beilock, Sian L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2011
Poor performance in pressure-filled situations, or "choking under pressure," has largely been explained by two different classes of theories. Distraction theories propose that choking occurs because attention needed to perform the task at hand is coopted by task-irrelevant thoughts and worries. Explicit monitoring theories claim essentially the…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Attention Control, Short Term Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McVay, Jennifer C.; Kane, Michael J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2012
Some people are better readers than others, and this variation in comprehension ability is predicted by measures of working memory capacity (WMC). The primary goal of this study was to investigate the mediating role of mind-wandering experiences in the association between WMC and normal individual differences in reading comprehension, as predicted…
Descriptors: Short Term Memory, Reading Comprehension, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mrazek, Michael D.; Smallwood, Jonathan; Franklin, Michael S.; Chin, Jason M.; Baird, Benjamin; Schooler, Jonathan W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2012
Tests of working memory capacity (WMC) and fluid intelligence (gF) are thought to capture variability in a crucial cognitive capacity that is broadly predictive of success, yet pinpointing the exact nature of this capacity is an area of ongoing controversy. We propose that mind-wandering is associated with performance on tests of WMC and gF,…
Descriptors: Evidence, Short Term Memory, Attention, Attention Control
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Logan, Gordon D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004
Four experiments explored the task span procedure: Subjects received lists of 1-10 task names to remember and then lists of 1-10 stimuli on which to perform the tasks. Task span is the number of tasks performed in order perfectly. Experiment 1 compared the task span with the traditional memory span in 6 practiced subjects and found little…
Descriptors: Long Term Memory, Short Term Memory, Task Analysis, Attention Control