NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nakayama, Mariko; Sears, Christopher R.; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010
Recent studies have found that masked word primes that are orthographic neighbors of the target inhibit lexical decision latencies (Davis & Lupker, 2006; Nakayama, Sears, & Lupker, 2008), consistent with the predictions of lexical competition models of visual word identification (e.g., Grainger & Jacobs, 1996). In contrast, using the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Testing, Word Recognition, Orthographic Symbols
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barnhart, Anthony S.; Goldinger, Stephen D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010
Handwritten word recognition is a field of study that has largely been neglected in the psychological literature, despite its prevalence in society. Whereas studies of spoken word recognition almost exclusively employ natural, human voices as stimuli, studies of visual word recognition use synthetic typefaces, thus simplifying the process of word…
Descriptors: Handwriting, Word Recognition, Figurative Language, Reader Text Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sereno, Sara C.; O'Donnell, Patrick J.; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
Recent debates on lexical ambiguity resolution have centered on the subordinate-bias effect, in which reading time is longer on a biased ambiguous word in a subordinate-biasing context than on a control word. The nature of the control word--namely, whether it matched the frequency of the ambiguous word's overall word form or its contextually…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Word Recognition, Bias, Reading Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Becker, Curtis A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979
Schuberth and Eimas (EJ 159 939) reported that context and frequency effects added to determine reaction times in a lexical decision (word v nonword) task. The present reexamination shows that context and frequency do interact, with semantic context facilitating the processing of low-frequency words more than high-frequency words. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Associative Learning, Classification, Context Clues, Higher Education