Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Adults | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Deafness | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Interference (Learning) | 1 |
| Pictorial Stimuli | 1 |
| Sign Language | 1 |
| Spatial Ability | 1 |
| Speech Communication | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Author
| Brouwer, Susanne | 1 |
| Karadöller, Dilay Z. | 1 |
| Manhardt, Francie | 1 |
| Mulder, Kimberley | 1 |
| Sümer, Beyza | 1 |
| Özyürek, Asli | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkManhardt, Francie; Özyürek, Asli; Sümer, Beyza; Mulder, Kimberley; Karadöller, Dilay Z.; Brouwer, Susanne – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
To talk about space, spoken languages rely on arbitrary and categorical forms (e.g., left, right). In sign languages, however, the visual-spatial modality allows for iconic encodings (motivated form-meaning mappings) of space in which form and location of the hands bear resemblance to the objects and spatial relations depicted. We assessed whether…
Descriptors: Speech Communication, Sign Language, Attention, Spatial Ability
