Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Alphabets | 3 |
Context Effect | 3 |
Word Recognition | 3 |
Reaction Time | 2 |
Spatial Ability | 2 |
Attention | 1 |
Audits (Verification) | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Cues | 1 |
Differences | 1 |
Difficulty Level | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 3 |
Author
Besner, Derek | 1 |
Fleri, Amanda M. | 1 |
Johnson, Rebecca L. | 1 |
Lanthier, Sophie N. | 1 |
Lee, Ji Hae | 1 |
McDaniel, Mark A. | 1 |
Risko, Evan F. | 1 |
Scullin, Michael K. | 1 |
Shelton, Jill T. | 1 |
Staub, Adrian | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Risko, Evan F.; Lanthier, Sophie N.; Besner, Derek – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
Reading is acutely sensitive to the amount of space between letters within a string. In the present investigation, we explore the impairment caused by increasing interletter spacing when reading single words and nonwords aloud. Specifically, 2 hypotheses are tested: (a) whether increasing interletter spacing induces serial processing while reading…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Alphabets, Proximity, Context Effect
Johnson, Rebecca L.; Staub, Adrian; Fleri, Amanda M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
Printed words that have a transposed-letter (TL) neighbor (e.g., angel has the TL neighbor angle) have been shown to be more difficult to process, in a range of paradigms, than words that do not have a TL neighbor. However, eye movement evidence suggests that this processing difficulty may occur on only a subset of trials. To investigate this…
Descriptors: Alphabets, Word Recognition, Language Processing, Orthographic Symbols
Scullin, Michael K.; McDaniel, Mark A.; Shelton, Jill T.; Lee, Ji Hae – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
We investigated whether focal/nonfocal effects (e.g., Einstein et al., 2005) in prospective memory (PM) are explained by cue differences in monitoring difficulty. In Experiment 1, we show that syllable cues (used in Einstein et al., 2005) are more difficult to monitor for than are word cues; however, initial-letter cues (in words) are similar in…
Descriptors: Memory, Intention, Cues, Alphabets