NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Risko, Evan F.; Lanthier, Sophie N.; Besner, Derek – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
Reading is acutely sensitive to the amount of space between letters within a string. In the present investigation, we explore the impairment caused by increasing interletter spacing when reading single words and nonwords aloud. Specifically, 2 hypotheses are tested: (a) whether increasing interletter spacing induces serial processing while reading…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Alphabets, Proximity, Context Effect
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Johnson, Rebecca L.; Staub, Adrian; Fleri, Amanda M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
Printed words that have a transposed-letter (TL) neighbor (e.g., angel has the TL neighbor angle) have been shown to be more difficult to process, in a range of paradigms, than words that do not have a TL neighbor. However, eye movement evidence suggests that this processing difficulty may occur on only a subset of trials. To investigate this…
Descriptors: Alphabets, Word Recognition, Language Processing, Orthographic Symbols
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scullin, Michael K.; McDaniel, Mark A.; Shelton, Jill T.; Lee, Ji Hae – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
We investigated whether focal/nonfocal effects (e.g., Einstein et al., 2005) in prospective memory (PM) are explained by cue differences in monitoring difficulty. In Experiment 1, we show that syllable cues (used in Einstein et al., 2005) are more difficult to monitor for than are word cues; however, initial-letter cues (in words) are similar in…
Descriptors: Memory, Intention, Cues, Alphabets