NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leggett, Jack M. I.; Burt, Jennifer S. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
Successfully retrieving information protects it against later forgetting. Failed retrieval attempts are also beneficial if followed by study of corrective feedback. To explain both of these findings, researchers have proposed the "mediation hypothesis." In the case of learning from corrective feedback, initial errors may serve as…
Descriptors: Error Patterns, Cues, Recall (Psychology), Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Potts, Rosalind; Davies, Gabriella; Shanks, David R. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
Guessing translations of foreign words ("hodei?"), before viewing corrective feedback ("hodei-cloud"), leads to better subsequent memory for correct translations than studying intact pairs ("hodei-cloud"), even when guesses are always incorrect (Potts & Shanks, 2014), but the mechanism underlying this effect is…
Descriptors: Translation, Feedback (Response), Memory, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cyr, Andrée-Ann; Anderson, Nicole D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
The memorial costs and benefits of trial-and-error learning have clear pedagogical implications for students, and increasing evidence shows that generating errors during episodic learning can improve memory among younger adults. Conversely, the aging literature has found that errors impair memory among healthy older adults and has advocated for…
Descriptors: Error Patterns, Memory, Learning Processes, Young Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Selmeczy, Diana; Dobbins, Ian G. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2013
Prior literature has primarily focused on the negative influences of misleading external sources on memory judgments. This study investigated whether participants can capitalize on generally reliable recommendations in order to improve their net performance; the focus was on potential roles for metacognitive monitoring (i.e., knowledge about one's…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Recognition (Psychology), Role, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Demeure, Virginie; Bonnefon, Jean-Francois; Raufaste, Eric – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2009
A successful theory of conditional reasoning requires an account of how reasoners recognize the pragmatic function a conditional statement is meant to perform. Situations in which it is ambiguous whether a conditional statement was meant to add information or to correct a mistake are discussed in this article. This ambiguity has direct…
Descriptors: Cues, Figurative Language, Logical Thinking, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Smith, Troy A.; Kimball, Daniel R. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
Most modern research on the effects of feedback during learning has assumed that feedback is an error correction mechanism. Recent studies of feedback-timing effects have suggested that feedback might also strengthen initially correct responses. In an experiment involving cued recall of trivia facts, we directly tested several theories of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Probability, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Butler, Andrew C.; Karpicke, Jeffrey D.; Roediger, Henry L., III – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2008
Previous studies investigating posttest feedback have generally conceptualized feedback as a method for correcting erroneous responses, giving virtually no consideration to how feedback might promote learning of correct responses. Here, the authors show that when correct responses are made with low confidence, feedback serves to correct this…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Multiple Choice Tests, Memory, Metacognition