NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wixted, John T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2022
Slamecka and McElree (1983) and Rivera-Lares et al. (2022), like others before them, factorially manipulated the number of learning trials and the retention interval. The results revealed two unsurprising main effects: (a) the more study trials, the higher the initial degree of learning, and (b) the longer the retention interval, the more items…
Descriptors: Memory, Recall (Psychology), Retention (Psychology), Neurosciences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eliot Hazeltine; Iring Koch; Daniel H. Weissman – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2024
Responses are slower in two-choice tasks when either a previous stimulus feature or the previous response repeats than when all features repeat or all features change. Current views of action control posit that such partial repetition costs (PRCs) index the time to update a prior "binding" between a stimulus feature and the response or…
Descriptors: College Students, Psychological Studies, Neurosciences, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Crossley, Matthew J.; Ashby, F. Gregory – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
There is now abundant evidence that human learning and memory are governed by multiple systems. As a result, research is now turning to the next question of how these putative systems interact. For instance, how is overall control of behavior coordinated, and does learning occur independently within systems regardless of what system is in control?…
Descriptors: Learning Processes, Memory, Neurosciences, Diagnostic Tests