NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Witherby, Amber E.; Carpenter, Shana K. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2022
When learning new information, students' prior knowledge related to that information will often vary. Prior research has not systematically explored how prior knowledge relates to learning of new, previously unknown information. Accordingly, the goal of the present research was to explore this relationship. In three experiments, students first…
Descriptors: Prior Learning, Knowledge Level, Student Attitudes, Learning Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Halamish, Vered; Undorf, Monika – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2023
Research has observed that monitoring one's own learning modifies memory for some materials but not for others. Specifically, making judgments of learning (JOLs) while learning word pairs improves subsequent cued-recall memory performance for related word pairs but not for unrelated word pairs. Theories that have attempted to explain this pattern…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Memory, Task Analysis, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
West, John T.; Mulligan, Neil W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
The majority of research on metamemory focuses on retrospective memory: memory for past events. Prospective memory, in contrast, refers to the process of remembering to carry out intentions in the future. Despite claims that metacognition is essential to prospective remembering, it is unclear whether the metamemorial effects that researchers have…
Descriptors: Memory, Metacognition, Recall (Psychology), Memorization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peng, Yaoping; Tullis, Jonathan G. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learners' metacognitive control and ultimately the efficacy…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Metacognition, Student Attitudes, Independent Study
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cohen, Michael S.; Rissman, Jesse; Hovhannisyan, Mariam; Castel, Alan D.; Knowlton, Barbara J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
People tend to show better memory for information that is deemed valuable or important. By one mechanism, individuals selectively engage deeper, semantic encoding strategies for high value items (Cohen, Rissman, Suthana, Castel, & Knowlton, 2014). By another mechanism, information paired with value or reward is automatically strengthened in…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Memory, Testing, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Davis, Sara D.; Chan, Jason C. K. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2015
Retrieving studied materials often enhances subsequent learning of new materials (Pastötter & Bäuml, 2014). However, retrieval has also been shown to impair new learning (Finn & Roediger, 2013). In this article, we attempted to determine when retrieval enhances and when it impairs new learning. We argue that testing impairs new learning…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Information Retrieval, Testing, Testing Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murayama, Kou; Blake, Adam B.; Kerr, Tyson; Castel, Alan D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
People are often exposed to more information than they can actually remember. Despite this frequent form of information overload, little is known about how much information people choose to remember. Using a novel "stop" paradigm, the current research examined whether and how people choose to stop receiving new--possibly…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Metacognition, Study Habits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mulligan, Neil W.; Peterson, Daniel J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Research suggests that spaced learning, compared with massed learning, results in superior long-term retention (the spacing effect). Son (2010) identified a potentially important moderator of the spacing effect: metacognitive control. Specifically, when participants chose massed restudy but were instead forced to space the restudy, the spacing…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Retention (Psychology), Item Analysis, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Middlebrooks, Paul G.; Sommer, Marc A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
This study investigated whether rhesus monkeys show evidence of metacognition in a reduced, visual oculomotor task that is particularly suitable for use in fMRI and electrophysiology. The 2-stage task involved punctate visual stimulation and saccadic eye movement responses. In each trial, monkeys made a decision and then made a bet. To earn…
Descriptors: Cues, Stimulation, Reaction Time, Eye Movements
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Toppino, Thomas C.; Cohen, Michael S. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
What do learners do when they control whether to engage in massed or spaced practice? According to theories by Son (2004) and by Metcalfe and Kornell (2005), the tendency for learners to choose spaced practice over massed practice should decline as item difficulty becomes greater. Support originally was obtained when pairs containing unfamiliar…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Difficulty Level, Learning Processes, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zaromb, Franklin M.; Karpicke, Jeffrey D.; Roediger, Henry L., III – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2010
We examined free recall and metacognitive judgments of ambiguous sentences studied with and without clues to facilitate their comprehension. Sentences were either studied without clues, with clues meaningfully embedded, or with clues following a 10-s interval delay. After presentation, subjects made judgments of comprehension (JCOMPs) or judgments…
Descriptors: Sentences, Metacognition, Recall (Psychology), Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Metcalfe, Janet; Finn, Bridgid – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2008
Two processes are postulated to underlie delayed judgments of learning (JOLs)--cue familiarity and target retrievability. The two processes are distinguishable because the familiarity-based judgments are thought to be faster than the retrieval-based processes, because only retrieval-based JOLs should enhance the relative accuracy of the…
Descriptors: Cues, Familiarity, Prediction, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jimenez, Luis; Vaquero, Joaquin M. M.; Lupianez, Juan – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006
Four experiments investigate the differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning concerning their resilience to structural and superficial task changes. A superficial change that embedded the SRT task in the context of a selection task, while maintaining the sequence, did selectively hinder the expression of implicit learning. In…
Descriptors: Sequential Learning, Learning Processes, Context Effect, Metacognition